医学
指南
随机对照试验
导管癌
乳腺癌
放射治疗
心理干预
保乳手术
内科学
癌症
乳房切除术
病理
精神科
作者
E. Shelley Hwang,Terry Hyslop,Thomas Lynch,Marc D. Ryser,Anna Weiss,Anna Wolf,Karen A. Norris,Meredith Witten,Lars J. Grimm,Stuart J. Schnitt,Sunil Badve,Rachel E. Factor,Elizabeth S. Frank,Deborah Collyar,Desiree Basila,Donna Pinto,Mark A. Watson,Robert B. West,Louise Davies,Jenny L. Donovan
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:2024-12-12
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.26698
摘要
Importance Active monitoring for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been proposed as an alternative to guideline-concordant care, but the safety of this approach is unknown. Objective To compare rates of invasive cancer in patients with low-risk DCIS receiving active monitoring vs guideline-concordant care. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective, randomized noninferiority trial enrolling 995 women aged 40 years or older with a new diagnosis of hormone receptor–positive grade 1 or grade 2 DCIS without invasive cancer at 100 US Alliance Cancer Cooperative Group clinical trial sites from 2017 to 2023. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive active monitoring (follow-up every 6 months with breast imaging and physical examination; n = 484) or guideline-concordant care (surgery with or without radiation therapy; n = 473). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 2-year cumulative risk of ipsilateral invasive cancer diagnosis, according to planned intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, with a noninferiority bound of 0.05%. Results The median age of the 957 participants analyzed was 63.6 (95% CI, 55.5-70.5) years in the guideline-concordant care group and 63.7 (95% CI, 60.0-71.6) years in the active monitoring group. Overall, 15.7% of participants were Black and 75.0% were White. In this prespecified primary analysis, median follow-up was 36.9 months; 346 patients had surgery for DCIS, 264 in the guideline-concordant care group and 82 in the active monitoring group. Forty-six women were diagnosed with invasive cancer, 19 in the active monitoring group and 27 in the guideline-concordant care group. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative rate of ipsilateral invasive cancer was 4.2% in the active monitoring group vs 5.9% in the guideline-concordant care group, a difference of −1.7% (upper limit of the 95% CI, 0.95%), indicating that active monitoring is not inferior to guideline-concordant care. Invasive tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance Women with low-risk DCIS randomized to active monitoring did not have a higher rate of invasive cancer in the same breast at 2 years compared with those randomized to guideline-concordant care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02926911
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI