系统回顾
现存分类群
领域(数学)
管理科学
计算机科学
知识管理
认识论
工程伦理学
心理学
政治学
经济
工程类
梅德林
哲学
生物
进化生物学
数学
法学
纯数学
作者
Justin Paul,Puja Khatri,Harshleen Kaur Duggal
标识
DOI:10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700
摘要
With the increased momentum of knowledge generation in the field of research, systematic reviews are essential to epitomise the state of extant literature and for theory building. In this article, we discuss the advantages of synthesising and reporting findings using a more impactful type of systematic review, the framework-based review. Additionally, we list and summarise some of the popularly used frameworks, TCCM (theories-contexts-characteristics-methods; Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019), ADO (antecedents-decisions-outcomes; Paul & Benito, 2018), 5W+ H (who, when, where, what, why, how; Callahan, Citation2014) and IMO (input-mediators-outcomes; Ilgen et al., Citation2005). We also provide methodological guidelines for conducting such a review.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI