What Happens When We Miss? Effect of Initial Lumbar Puncture Success on Infant Sepsis Evaluation

医学 败血症 腰椎穿刺 逻辑回归 儿科 回顾性队列研究 人口统计学的 重症监护室 重症监护 急诊医学 内科学 重症监护医学 脑脊液 人口学 社会学
作者
Amanda R. Dube,Manaswitha Khare,Michael L. Levy,Michelle Edmunds,Aarti Patel,Begem Lee,Tiranun Rungvivatjarus,Elizabeth Mannino Avila
出处
期刊:Hospital pediatrics [American Academy of Pediatrics]
卷期号:15 (9): 758-768
标识
DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2024-008289
摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Lumbar punctures (LPs) are a common part of infant sepsis evaluations. Failures are estimated at 12% to 40%. Given limited literature on this topic, we describe characteristics, management, and outcomes for infants undergoing sepsis workup with successful vs unsuccessful initial LPs, including those who underwent repeat LP attempt. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of infants aged 0 to 60 days with LP performed during sepsis evaluation. Infants admitted to intensive care units, transferred from another hospital’s inpatient unit, or with medical complexity were excluded. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS Of 468 infants, 386 had a successful initial LP (82%). Length of stay (LOS) was longer in infants with an unsuccessful initial LP (P = 0.02). Demographics, length of antibiotics, and readmission rate did not differ between groups. Infants with successful initial LPs were less likely to have viral testing (P = 0.019) and had shorter acyclovir courses (P = 0.026). Only 43% of infants with an unsuccessful initial LP underwent repeat LP attempt. Increased inflammatory markers were associated with repeat LP attempt. CONCLUSIONS Infants with unsuccessful initial LPs had increased LOS and resource use. Elevated inflammatory markers were associated with repeat LP attempt, and infants with repeat LPs had higher medical utilization. Prospective or multicenter studies are needed to further investigate outcomes and decision-making for infants with unsuccessful LPs and inform guidelines regarding repeat LPs.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Jun完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
危机的秋双完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
四喜丸子应助someone采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助混沌采纳,获得10
2秒前
爆米花应助Singularity采纳,获得10
3秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助潇洒采纳,获得10
3秒前
Yuelu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
脑洞疼应助研友_842M4n采纳,获得10
4秒前
SciGPT应助Elio采纳,获得10
4秒前
keke完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
yzy应助青思采纳,获得10
5秒前
今后应助奋斗迎荷采纳,获得10
5秒前
顾矜应助兴奋飞荷采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
龟龟酱关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
6秒前
张凤发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
星辰大海应助xuan采纳,获得10
8秒前
yjy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
snding完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
雾1206完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
karaha发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
阿聪发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
正直的小伙应助科研小白采纳,获得30
12秒前
12秒前
Qintt发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
八旬老太蹬三轮买菜关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
cchenn完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
天真歌曲举报小雨求助涉嫌违规
14秒前
aspas发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
How to Use Machine Learning in Chemistry: An Introduction 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7582182
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9161229
关于积分的说明 19602032
捐赠科研通 7164313
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3266104
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2431004
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2257295