Risk results from screening for a high cardiovascular disease risk by means of traditional risk factor measurement or coronary artery calcium scoring in the ROBINSCA trial

医学 弗雷明翰风险评分 无症状的 四分位间距 钙化积分 随机对照试验 风险因素 内科学 风险评估 人口 冠状动脉疾病 疾病 冠状动脉钙 环境卫生 计算机科学 计算机安全
作者
Carlijn van der Aalst,Sabine J A M Denissen,Marleen Vonder,J.-W.C Gratema,Henk J Adriaansen,Dirkjan Kuijpers,R. Vliegenthart,Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep,Pim van der Harst,Richard L. Braam,P Van Dijkman,Rykel van Bruggen,Matthijs Oudkerk,Harry J. de Koning
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:41 (Supplement_2) 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2959
摘要

Abstract Aims Screening for a high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk followed by preventive treatment can potentially reduce coronary heart disease (CHD)-related morbidity and mortality. ROBINSCA (Risk Or Benefit IN Screening for CArdiovascular disease) is a population-based randomized controlled screening trial that investigates the effectiveness of CVD screening in asymptomatic participants using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) model or Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring. This study describes the distributions in risk and treatment in the ROBINSCA trial. Methods and results Individuals at expected elevated CVD risk were randomized (1:1:1) into the control arm (n=14,519; usual care); screening arm A (n=14,478; SCORE, 10-year fatal and non-fatal risk); or screening arm B (n=14,450; CAC scoring). Preventive treatment was largely advised according to current Dutch guidelines. Risk and treatment differences between the screening arms were analysed. 12,185 participants (84.2%) in arm A and 12,950 (89.6%) in arm B were screened. 48.7% were women, and median age was 62 (InterQuartile Range 10) years. SCORE screening identified 45.1% at low risk (SCORE<10%), 26.5% at intermediate risk (SCORE 10–20%), and 28.4% at high risk (SCORE≥20%). According to CAC screening, 76.0% were at low risk (Agatston<100), 15.1% at high risk (Agatston 100–399), and 8.9% at very high risk (Agatston≥400). CAC scoring significantly reduced the number of individuals indicated for preventive treatment compared to SCORE (relative reduction women: 37.2%; men: 28.8%). Conclusion We showed that compared to risk stratification based on SCORE, CAC scoring classified significantly fewer men and women at increased risk, and less preventive treatment was indicated. ROBINSCA flowchart Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Advanced Research Grant

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
芒果发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
英勇的夏槐完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
拉拉发布了新的文献求助200
2秒前
duwenzhao2026完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
血小板发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
feifei发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助公龟采纳,获得10
3秒前
Xixi_yuan发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
踏实的谷蕊完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Summer发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
干饭野猫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
灵寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助努力毕业啊采纳,获得10
5秒前
福旺云吞发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
朴实的白玉完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
赘婿应助guan采纳,获得10
7秒前
xin完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
隐形曼青应助妄自采纳,获得10
8秒前
小郭小郭发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
是毛果芸香碱完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
hsj完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
samaritan发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
ianlaikk发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
Shamsallah发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5750756
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5465712
关于积分的说明 15367939
捐赠科研通 4889850
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2629420
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1577683
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1534066