医学
弗雷明翰风险评分
无症状的
四分位间距
钙化积分
随机对照试验
风险因素
内科学
风险评估
人口
冠状动脉疾病
疾病
冠状动脉钙
环境卫生
计算机科学
计算机安全
作者
Carlijn van der Aalst,Sabine J A M Denissen,Marleen Vonder,J.-W.C Gratema,Henk J Adriaansen,Dirkjan Kuijpers,R. Vliegenthart,Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep,Pim van der Harst,Richard L. Braam,P Van Dijkman,Rykel van Bruggen,Matthijs Oudkerk,Harry J. de Koning
标识
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2959
摘要
Abstract Aims Screening for a high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk followed by preventive treatment can potentially reduce coronary heart disease (CHD)-related morbidity and mortality. ROBINSCA (Risk Or Benefit IN Screening for CArdiovascular disease) is a population-based randomized controlled screening trial that investigates the effectiveness of CVD screening in asymptomatic participants using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) model or Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring. This study describes the distributions in risk and treatment in the ROBINSCA trial. Methods and results Individuals at expected elevated CVD risk were randomized (1:1:1) into the control arm (n=14,519; usual care); screening arm A (n=14,478; SCORE, 10-year fatal and non-fatal risk); or screening arm B (n=14,450; CAC scoring). Preventive treatment was largely advised according to current Dutch guidelines. Risk and treatment differences between the screening arms were analysed. 12,185 participants (84.2%) in arm A and 12,950 (89.6%) in arm B were screened. 48.7% were women, and median age was 62 (InterQuartile Range 10) years. SCORE screening identified 45.1% at low risk (SCORE<10%), 26.5% at intermediate risk (SCORE 10–20%), and 28.4% at high risk (SCORE≥20%). According to CAC screening, 76.0% were at low risk (Agatston<100), 15.1% at high risk (Agatston 100–399), and 8.9% at very high risk (Agatston≥400). CAC scoring significantly reduced the number of individuals indicated for preventive treatment compared to SCORE (relative reduction women: 37.2%; men: 28.8%). Conclusion We showed that compared to risk stratification based on SCORE, CAC scoring classified significantly fewer men and women at increased risk, and less preventive treatment was indicated. ROBINSCA flowchart Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Advanced Research Grant
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI