Evaluation of an Automated Module Synthesis and a Sterile Cold Kit–Based Preparation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients with Prostate Cancer

⁶⁸Ga-labeled urea-based inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), such as ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, are promising small molecules for targeting prostate cancer (PCa). Although this radiopharmaceutical was produced mostly by means of manual synthesis and automated synthesis modules, a sterile cold kit was recently introduced. The aim of our study was to evaluate the image quality of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (PSMA-PET) in a population of PCa patients after the injection of comparable activities of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 obtained with the 2 different synthetic procedures. A secondary aim was to identify secondary factors that may have an impact on image quality and, thus, final interpretation. Methods: Two different groups of 100 consecutive PCa patients who underwent PSMA-PET were included in the study. The first group of patients was imaged with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 obtained using synthesis modules, whereas the second group’s tracer activity was synthesized using a sterile cold kit. All PET images were independently reviewed by 2 nuclear medicine diagnosticians with at least 2 y of experience in PSMA-based imaging and unaware of the patients’ clinical history. The 2 reviewers independently rated the quality of each PSMA-PET scan using a 3-point Likert-type scale. In cases of discordance, the operators together reviewed the images and reached a consensus. Performance was evaluated on the basis of the expected biodistribution, lesion detection rate, and physiologic background uptake. Results: Overall, 104 of 200 (52%) PSMA-PET scans were positive for PCa-related findings. No significant differences in image quality between cold kits and synthesis modules were found (P = 0.13), although a higher proportion of images was rated as excellent by the observers for kits than for modules (45% vs. 34%). Furthermore, after image quality had been dichotomized as excellent or not excellent, multivariate regression analysis found several factors to be significantly associated with a not-excellent quality: an increase in patient age (+5 y: odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.75), an increase in patient weight (+5 kg: OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.53–2.32), an increase in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 uptake time (+10 min: OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08–1.96), and a decrease in injected activity (−10 MBq: OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07–1.52). Conclusion: No significant differences were identified between the 2 groups of patients undergoing PSMA-PET; therefore, we were not able to ascertain any significant influences of tracer production methodology on final scan quality. However, increased patient age, increased patient weight, decreased injected activity, and increased ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 uptake time were significantly associated with an overall poorer image quality.