Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial

医学 全身麻醉 麻醉 局部麻醉 随机对照试验 乳腺癌 外科 癌症 内科学
作者
Daniel I. Sessler,Lijian Pei,Yuguang Huang,Edith Fleischmann,Peter Marhofer,Andrea Kurz,Douglas B. Mayers,Tanja Meyer‐Treschan,Martin Grady,Ern Yu Tan,Sabry Ayad,Edward J. Mascha,Donal J. Buggy,Gang Tan,Zhiyong Zhang,Helen Keane,Maurice Stokes,Oliver Zotti,Michael Gnant,Silvia Perez-Protto
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:394 (10211): 1807-1815 被引量:401
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32313-x
摘要

Background Three perioperative factors impair host defence against recurrence during cancer surgery: the surgical stress response, use of volatile anaesthetic, and opioids for analgesia. All factors are ameliorated by regional anaesthesia-analgesia. We tested the primary hypothesis that breast cancer recurrence after potentially curative surgery is lower with regional anaesthesia-analgesia using paravertebral blocks and the anaesthetic propofol than with general anaesthesia with the volatile anaesthetic sevoflurane and opioid analgesia. A second hypothesis was that regional anaesthesia-analgesia reduces persistent incisional pain. Methods We did a randomised controlled trial at 13 hospitals in Argentina, Austria, China, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, and the USA. Women (age <85 years) having potentially curative primary breast cancer resections were randomised by computer to either regional anaesthesia-analgesia (paravertebral blocks and propofol) or general anaesthesia (sevoflurane) and opioid analgesia. The primary outcome was local or metastatic breast cancer recurrence. The secondary outcome was incisional pain at 6 months and 12 months. Primary analyses were done under intention-to-treat principles. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00418457. The study was stopped after a preplanned futility boundary was crossed. Findings Between Jan 30, 2007, and Jan 18, 2018, 2132 women were enrolled to the study, of whom 24 were excluded before surgery. 1043 were assigned to regional anaesthesia-analgesia and 1065 were allocated to general anaesthesia. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between study groups. Median follow-up was 36 (IQR 24–49) months. Among women assigned regional anaesthesia-analgesia, 102 (10%) recurrences were reported, compared with 111 (10%) recurrences among those allocated general anaesthesia (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·74–1·28; p=0·84). Incisional pain was reported by 442 (52%) of 856 patients assigned to regional anaesthesia-analgesia and 456 (52%) of 872 patients allocated to general anaesthesia at 6 months, and by 239 (28%) of 854 patients and 232 (27%) of 852 patients, respectively, at 12 months (overall interim-adjusted odds ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·85–1·17; p=0·99). Neuropathic breast pain did not differ by anaesthetic technique and was reported by 87 (10%) of 859 patients assigned to regional anaesthesia-analgesia and 89 (10%) of 870 patients allocated to general anaesthesia at 6 months, and by 57 (7%) of 857 patients and 57 (7%) of 854 patients, respectively, at 12 months. Interpretation In our study population, regional anaesthesia-analgesia (paravertebral block and propofol) did not reduce breast cancer recurrence after potentially curative surgery compared with volatile anaesthesia (sevoflurane) and opioids. The frequency and severity of persistent incisional breast pain was unaffected by anaesthetic technique. Clinicians can use regional or general anaesthesia with respect to breast cancer recurrence and persistent incisional pain. Funding Sisk Healthcare Foundation (Ireland), Eccles Breast Cancer Research Fund, British Journal of Anaesthesia International, College of Anaesthetists of Ireland, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Science Fund for Junior Faculty 2016, Central Bank of Austria, and National Healthcare Group.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wenxianxiazai123完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
付政完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
打打应助铁甲小宝采纳,获得10
1秒前
萝卜特二完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
虚幻灵松完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
PQ完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
霸气的听白完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
7mi完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
诸葛烤鸭完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
初醒完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
梨花酥发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助付政采纳,获得10
6秒前
李佳完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
刘小孩完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
liansj完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
海北完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
赵田完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
叶若相怜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
光亮的青文完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
落落大方的松完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Jane完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
风中的溪流完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Jasen完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
wt完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
yes完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
Hollen完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
daI夫人完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
王心心完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
铁甲小宝完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
xingyi完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
晓风残月完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Joaquin完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Linsey发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
渔婆完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
徐伟业完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
敏感向雪完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7257809
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8879654
关于积分的说明 18758068
捐赠科研通 6938139
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201148
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375264
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176997