医学
科克伦图书馆
荟萃分析
支架
食管癌
放射治疗
危险系数
梅德林
内科学
癌症
肿瘤科
置信区间
政治学
法学
作者
Amin Doosti-Irani,Mohammad Alì Mansournia,Zahra Cheraghi,Abbas Rahimiforoushani,Peiman Haddad
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103506
摘要
We aimed to compare available palliative treatments in terms of survival and to rank these treatments for esophageal cancer. Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched. The risk of bias was judged using Cochrane's tools. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi2 test and was quantified by I2. The results were summarized using the hazard ratio (HR). The rank probability for each treatment was calculated using the p-score. Nineteen RCTs met the eligibility criteria for this study. Treatments formed three networks including networks A, B, and C. The Ultraflex stent (p-score = 0.93), irradiation stent (p-score = 0.89), and thermal ablative therapy (p-score = 0.85) were the first ranking treatments in networks A, B, and C, respectively. Based on the results of this network meta-analysis, it appears that the ultraflex stent, the irradiation stent, and thermal ablative therapy are the better treatments among the networks.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI