术语
干细胞
医学
造血
细胞疗法
命名法
电池类型
生物信息学
病理
神经科学
细胞
免疫学
重症监护医学
生物
细胞生物学
遗传学
语言学
分类学(生物学)
植物
哲学
作者
Doris A. Taylor,Lourdes Chacon‐Alberty,Luiz C. Sampaio,Mariana Gonzalez del Hierro,Emerson C. Perin,Fernanda Mesquita,Timothy D. Henry,Jay H. Traverse,Carl J. Pepine,Joshua M. Hare,Michael P. Murphy,Phillip C. Yang,Keith L. March,Rachel W. Vojvodic,Ray F. Ebert,Roberto Bolli
摘要
Abstract Exogenous cell-based therapy has emerged as a promising new strategy to facilitate repair of hearts damaged by acute or chronic injury. However, the field of cell-based therapy is handicapped by the lack of standardized definitions and terminology, making comparisons across studies challenging. Even the term ‘stem cell therapy’ is misleading because only a small percentage of cells derived from adult bone marrow, peripheral blood, or adipose tissue meets the accepted haematopoietic or developmental definition of stem cells. Furthermore, cells (stem or otherwise) are dynamic biological products, meaning that their surface-marker expression, phenotypic and functional characteristics, and the products they secrete in response to their microenvironment can change. It is also important to point out that most surface markers are seldom specific for a cell type. In this article, we discuss the lack of consistency in the descriptive terminology used in cell-based therapies and offer guidelines aimed at standardizing nomenclature and definitions to improve communication among investigators and the general public.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI