亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?

医学实验室 过程(计算) 质量(理念) 计算机科学 控制(管理) 风险分析(工程) 医学物理学 医学 病理 认识论 操作系统 哲学 人工智能
作者
Mario Plebani
出处
期刊:Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine [De Gruyter]
卷期号:44 (6): 750-9 被引量:702
标识
DOI:10.1515/cclm.2006.123
摘要

Laboratory testing is a highly complex process and, although laboratory services are relatively safe, they are not as safe as they could or should be. Clinical laboratories have long focused their attention on quality control methods and quality assessment programs dealing with analytical aspects of testing. However, a growing body of evidence accumulated in recent decades demonstrates that quality in clinical laboratories cannot be assured by merely focusing on purely analytical aspects. The more recent surveys on errors in laboratory medicine conclude that in the delivery of laboratory testing, mistakes occur more frequently before (pre-analytical) and after (post-analytical) the test has been performed. Most errors are due to pre-analytical factors (46-68.2% of total errors), while a high error rate (18.5-47% of total errors) has also been found in the post-analytical phase. Errors due to analytical problems have been significantly reduced over time, but there is evidence that, particularly for immunoassays, interference may have a serious impact on patients. A description of the most frequent and risky pre-, intra- and post-analytical errors and advice on practical steps for measuring and reducing the risk of errors is therefore given in the present paper. Many mistakes in the Total Testing Process are called "laboratory errors", although these may be due to poor communication, action taken by others involved in the testing process (e.g., physicians, nurses and phlebotomists), or poorly designed processes, all of which are beyond the laboratory's control. Likewise, there is evidence that laboratory information is only partially utilized. A recent document from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) recommends a new, broader definition of the term "laboratory error" and a classification of errors according to different criteria. In a modern approach to total quality, centered on patients' needs and satisfaction, the risk of errors and mistakes in pre- and post-examination steps must be minimized to guarantee the total quality of laboratory services.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LH完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
碧蓝溪流完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
英姑应助楽le采纳,获得10
12秒前
18秒前
谨慎的花生完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
kk发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
26秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
Copyright应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
刘瀚臻完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
刘瀚臻发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Sausage完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
英俊的铭应助刘瀚臻采纳,获得10
33秒前
舒心访文完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
ranan发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
鹤轸完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
木槿完成签到,获得积分20
46秒前
卡比兽mini完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
完美世界应助木槿采纳,获得10
49秒前
CipherSage应助ranan采纳,获得10
52秒前
毛豆应助江氏巨颏虎采纳,获得10
57秒前
可爱的函函应助楽le采纳,获得10
58秒前
Suchus完成签到,获得积分20
59秒前
fei发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
Sausage发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
楽le发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
lww完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
毛豆应助dw1234采纳,获得10
1分钟前
佟语雪完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
專注完美近乎苛求完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
ranan发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7257420
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8879428
关于积分的说明 18756875
捐赠科研通 6937882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201074
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375192
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176929