Biweekly gemcitabine and capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

e14617 Background: Some patients with mCRC are still susceptible to continue with active therapy after progression to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan regimens due to their good performance status. Preclinical and clinical trials suggest that gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidines are synergic antimetabolites. Their major mechanism of action is to incorporate dFdCTP into DNA and to introduce FUTP into RNA, respectively, affecting their processing and function. This study aims to describe patients profile and response to gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap) in heavily pretreated mCRC, and so possible predictive factors for survival. Methods: Between June 2001 and July 2011, 119 evaluable patients pretreated with oxaliplatin and irinotecan regimens were enrolled: ECOG 0-1 97%, male 68%, median age 63yo, range: 36-79, rectum 57%, 3rd line: 61%. Patients received Gem 1000 mg/m 2 d2 and Cap 1000 mg/m 2 BID x 7d q2w. Survival analysis was determined by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. Results: ORR and clinical benefit were: 5% and 36%. Median PFS and OS were 2.83m (0.43-35) and 6.53m (0.47m-10yrs in patient with complete response). Most frequent toxicities were anemia (22%), thrombocytopenia (10%), hand-foot syndrome (9%) and grade ≥3 were diarrhea in 5%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Predictive factors for PFS and OS are shown in Table. Statistic significance was registered in favor of clinical benefit achieved and for those who had not previously received monoclonal Abs, for SLP and OS respectively. Moreover, patients under 65yo tend to have a better survival. Conclusions: These data suggest GemCap is a tolerable regimen that achieves maintained responses for non selected heavily preated mCRC patients, especially in those reaching radiological clinical benefit, without previous use of monoclonal Abs and younger patients. [Table: see text]