A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process

审议 任务(项目管理) 集合(抽象数据类型) 过程(计算) 计算机科学 钥匙(锁) 脚本语言 群体决策 知识管理 心理学 社会心理学 工程类 计算机安全 政治 政治学 法学 程序设计语言 操作系统 系统工程
作者
Glyn Elwyn,Marie‐Anne Durand,Julia Song,Johanna W. M. Aarts,Paul Barr,Zackary Berger,Nan Cochran,Dominick L. Frosch,Dariusz Galasiński,Pål Gulbrandsen,Paul K. J. Han,Martin Härter,Paul Kinnersley,Amy Lloyd,Manish Mishra,Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez,Isabelle Scholl,Kounosuke Tomori,Lyndal Trevena,Holly O. Witteman
出处
期刊:BMJ [BMJ]
卷期号:: j4891-j4891 被引量:784
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.j4891
摘要

Objectives To revise an existing three-talk model for learning how to achieve shared decision making, and to consult with relevant stakeholders to update and obtain wider engagement.Design Multistage consultation process.Setting Key informant group, communities of interest, and survey of clinical specialties.Participants 19 key informants, 153 member responses from multiple communities of interest, and 316 responses to an online survey from medically qualified clinicians from six specialties.Results After extended consultation over three iterations, we revised the three-talk model by making changes to one talk category, adding the need to elicit patient goals, providing a clear set of tasks for each talk category, and adding suggested scripts to illustrate each step. A new three-talk model of shared decision making is proposed, based on "team talk," "option talk," and "decision talk," to depict a process of collaboration and deliberation. Team talk places emphasis on the need to provide support to patients when they are made aware of choices, and to elicit their goals as a means of guiding decision making processes. Option talk refers to the task of comparing alternatives, using risk communication principles. Decision talk refers to the task of arriving at decisions that reflect the informed preferences of patients, guided by the experience and expertise of health professionals.Conclusions The revised three-talk model of shared decision making depicts conversational steps, initiated by providing support when introducing options, followed by strategies to compare and discuss trade-offs, before deliberation based on informed preferences.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小雨快跑完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
大胆博发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
DW应助whj采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
超帅发夹完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Genius完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研副本完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
shanshui完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
orixero应助Floy采纳,获得10
3秒前
柠溪完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
超帅孱完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Arain456完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
Jasper应助suzy采纳,获得50
4秒前
mani发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助CScs25采纳,获得10
4秒前
柚子苗完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
齐珏完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
共享精神应助小Q采纳,获得10
5秒前
April发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
科研通AI6.4应助514749采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
向前进完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
幸福心跳跳完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
WJY发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
离研通完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
香蕉觅云应助llm的同桌采纳,获得10
7秒前
可可完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
阔达的姒完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
大胆博完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.4应助lly2025采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7779100
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9319305
关于积分的说明 20370562
捐赠科研通 7366438
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3319361
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2467350
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2334853