克朗巴赫阿尔法
医学
颈部疼痛
可视模拟标度
结构效度
可靠性(半导体)
物理疗法
比例(比率)
横断面研究
临床心理学
心理测量学
地图学
病理
替代医学
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
地理
作者
Shiqi Cao,Chunhui Zhou,Qi Wang,Fanqi Hu,Leiming Zhang,Yu Ding,Xuesong Zhang
出处
期刊:Spine
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2020-12-21
卷期号:46 (15): 1048-1053
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000003899
摘要
Study Design. A cross-sectional study. Objective. Th aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt Copenhagen Neck Function Disability Scale into a Simplified Chinese version (CNFDS-C), and evaluate the reliability and validity of CNFDS-C in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain. Summary of Background Data. The CNFDS is a reliable and valid evaluation instrument for chronic neck pain. However, Simplified Chinese version of CNFDS hasn’t been validated. Methods. A total of 150 participants were included in this study. Internal consistency was estimated according to Cronbach alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was analyzed by correlations between CNFDS-C and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as well as the short form (36) health survey (SF-36). Results. The original version of the CNFDS was cross-culturally adapted and translated into Simplified Chinese. CNFDS-C was indicated to have excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.810, ICC = 0.927). Moderate to substantial correlations between CNFDS-C and NDI ( r = 0.642, P < 0.001), VAS ( r = 0.581, P < 0.001), as well as Physical Function ( r = −0.583, P < .001), Role Physical ( r = −0.478, P < 0.001), Bodily Pain ( r = −0.610, P < 0.001), and General Health ( r = −0.439, P < 0.001) subscales of SF-36 were observed. Conclusion. CNFDS-C was demonstrated to have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain, which could be recommended for patients in Chinese mainland. Level of Evidence: 3
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI