Reported Bone Pain in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Pegfilgrastim Clinical Trials: A Retrospective Analysis.

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 骨痛 内科学 肿瘤科 不利影响 化疗 肺癌 外科 乳腺癌 癌症 粒细胞集落刺激因子
作者
Stephanie Ann Gregory,May F. Mo,Charles L. Vogel,Jorge Sierra,Lee Steven Schwartzberg
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:114 (22): 4561-4561 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v114.22.4561.4561
摘要

Abstract Abstract 4561 Background Mild to moderate bone pain is the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (AE) associated with administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs). There is a perception that bone pain associated with pegfilgrastim (the pegylated form of filgrastim) occurs at a higher frequency, is more severe, and is less predictable than bone pain associated with filgrastim. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective analysis examining bone pain in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in pegfilgrastim clinical trials was conducted. Methods Data analyzed were from 12 sponsor-supported trials of once per chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim (6 mg fixed dose or 100 mcg/kg) versus daily filgrastim (5 mcg/kg) or versus no G-CSF administered following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. The AEs reported were coded according to MedDRA (version 11) and the preferred terms considered to include bone pain were determined prior to analysis. Incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 bone pain were calculated by treatment (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, or no G-CSF) and chemotherapy cycle. Results Data for patients who received pegfilgrastim (n=1498), filgrastim (n=354) or no G-CSF (n=1102) were included in this analysis. In the 7 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=377) with filgrastim (n=354) in patients with NHL, breast or lung cancer, similar proportions of patients reported bone pain of any grade (Table 1). In both treatment arms, bone pain incidence was highest in the first cycle of chemotherapy and decreased in subsequent cycles. In both the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms, grade 3/4 bone pain incidence was low across all cycles (6.6% and 7.9%, respectively), in the first cycle (4.2% and 5.4%, respectively), and in subsequent cycles (Table 1). In the 5 studies comparing pegfilgrastim (n=1121) with no G-CSF (n=1102) in patients with NHL, breast, lung, colorectal, or ovarian cancer, 74% of the patients were female, 78% were white and the median (minimum, maximum) age was 65 (18, 88) years. Of these patients, 53% had breast cancer and 68% received a taxane-based regimen. Three of the 5 studies allowed pegfilgrastim use after cycle 1 in the control arm (ie, secondary prophylaxis); therefore, only cycle 1 bone pain incidences were compared for this analysis. The proportion (confidence interval [CI]) of patients who reported bone pain in the first cycle of chemotherapy was higher in the pegfilgrastim arm than the no G-CSF arm; 32.7% (30.0%, 35.6%) versus 23.0% (20.6%, 25.7%). Grade 3/4 bone pain was infrequently reported in these patients (3.4% [2.4%, 4.6%] pegfilgrastim, 2.0% [1.3%, 3.0%] no G-CSF). Conclusions In this analysis, bone pain was common in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and was most frequently reported in the first cycle of treatment. Bone pain incidences were similar for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim arms and slightly higher in the pegfilgrastim than in the no G-CSF arm. Bone pain may be associated with a combination of factors including disease state (eg, metastatic site), co-morbid conditions (eg, arthritis, osteoporosis), type of chemotherapy received, and growth factor use. Severe bone pain can and does occur in this population; however, this was infrequently reported in the studies included in this analysis. Disclosures: Gregory: Amgen: Consultancy. Mo:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vogel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EMD Serono: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Norvatis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Schwartzberg:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
大模型的应助被秀秀秀采纳,获得10
1秒前
甜美刺猬完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
hjygzv发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Enigma_GEB的应助被夏蓉采纳,获得200
4秒前
ww发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
momo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
烟花的应助被洪汉采纳,获得10
7秒前
gosu完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
张静瑶发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
啾啾小船发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
shs发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
上官若男的应助被sasa采纳,获得10
12秒前
nns发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
cdercder的应助被yangmiemie采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被yangmiemie采纳,获得10
14秒前
共享精神的应助被yangmiemie采纳,获得10
14秒前
mTOR完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
17秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被互化化采纳,获得10
17秒前
hjygzv完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
沉静迎天完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
19秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被amour采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
LC发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
烟花的应助被nns采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
25秒前
shn发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被张静瑶采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
丘比特的应助被Gjjjjjjj采纳,获得10
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
A Will for the Machine: Computerization, Automation, and the Arts in South Africa 400
Decentring Leadership 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7808377
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9340890
关于积分的说明 20504142
捐赠科研通 7400591
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3328797
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2475486
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2347107