规范性
空格(标点符号)
持续性
社会学
计算机科学
政治学
法学
操作系统
生态学
生物
作者
Felix Creutzig,Aneeque Javaid,Zakia Soomauroo,Steffen Lohrey,Nikola Milojevic-Dupont,Anjali Ramakrishnan,Mahendra Sethi,Lijing Liu,Leila Niamir,Christopher Bren d’Amour,Ulf Weddige,Dominic Lenzi,Martin Kowarsch,Luisa Arndt,Lulzim Baumann,Jody Betzien,Lesly Fonkwa,Bettina Huber,Ernesto Méndez,Alexandra Misiou
标识
DOI:10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795
摘要
Urban street space is increasingly contested. However, it is unclear what a fair street space allocation would look like. We develop a framework of ten ethical principles and three normative perspectives on street space – streets for transport, streets for sustainability, and streets as place – and discuss 14 derived street space allocation mechanisms. We contrast these ethically grounded allocation mechanisms with real-world allocation in 18 streets in Berlin. We find that car users, on average, had 3.5 times more space available than non-car users. While some allocation mechanisms are more plausible than others, none is without disputed normative implications. All of the ethical principles, however, suggest that on-street parking for cars is difficult to justify, and that cycling deserves more space. We argue that ethical principles should be systematically integrated into urban and transport planning.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI