Basal Infusion versus Automated Boluses and a Delayed Start Timer for “Continuous” Sciatic Nerve Blocks after Ambulatory Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

作者
John J. Finneran,Engy T. Said,Brian P. Curran,Matthew W Swisher,Jessica R Black,Rodney A Gabriel,Jacklynn F. Sztain,Wendy B. Abramson,Brenton Alexander,Michael C Donohue,Adam Schaar,Brian M. Ilfeld
出处
期刊:Anesthesiology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:136 (6): 970-982 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1097/aln.0000000000004189
摘要

Background The common technique using a basal infusion for an ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks frequently results in exhaustion of the local anesthetic reservoir before resolution of surgical pain. This study was designed to improve and prolong analgesia by delaying initiation using an integrated timer and delivering a lower hourly volume of local anesthetic as automated boluses. The hypothesis was that compared with a traditional continuous infusion, ropivacaine administered with automated boluses at a lower dose and 5-h delay would (1) provide at least noninferior analgesia (difference in average pain no greater than 1.7 points) while both techniques were functioning (average pain score day after surgery) and (2) result in a longer duration (dual primary outcomes). Methods Participants (n = 70) undergoing foot or ankle surgery with a popliteal–sciatic catheter received an injection of ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (20 ml) and then were randomized to receive ropivacaine (0.2%) either as continuous infusion (6 ml/h) initiated before discharge or as automated boluses (8 ml every 2 h) initiated 5 h after discharge using a timer. Both groups could self-deliver supplemental boluses (4 ml, lockout 30 min); participants and outcome assessors were blinded to randomization. All randomized participants were included in the data analysis. Results The day after surgery, participants with automated boluses had a median [interquartile range] pain score of 0.0 [0.0 to 3.0] versus 3.0 [1.8 to 4.8] for the continuous infusion group, with an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.23 to 7.84; P = 0.033) adjusting for body mass index. Reservoir exhaustion in the automated boluses group occurred after a median [interquartile range] of 119 h [109 to 125] versus 74 h [57 to 80] for the continuous infusion group (difference of 47 h; 95% CI, 38 to 55; P < 0.001 adjusting for body mass index). Conclusions For popliteal–sciatic catheters, replacing a continuous infusion initiated before discharge with automated boluses and a start-delay timer resulted in better analgesia and longer infusion duration. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_VZG7GZ应助black采纳,获得10
刚刚
奥斯特拉风司机完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
qingchi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
才疏正在学完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
Qiuqiu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
酷酷绮南完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助ldt采纳,获得10
5秒前
共享精神应助活力汉堡采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
隐形曼青应助Sharif318采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
law完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
jxwangorange应助ooooodai采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
梦m完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助chenguanyiren采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
CodeCraft应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
9秒前
懵懂的元正完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
烟花应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
9秒前
英姑应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
9秒前
华仔应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
10秒前
lonmi44完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
慕青应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
10秒前
顾矜应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
10秒前
酷波er应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
10秒前
大模型应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
10秒前
香蕉觅云应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
lailai应助汤圆软软软采纳,获得10
11秒前
小马甲应助楊書銘采纳,获得10
12秒前
苗条凡发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
黄平平发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
残剑月发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
xxz关闭了xxz文献求助
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Nature-Inspired Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications 600
Perfectionism in School 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7730278
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9282114
关于积分的说明 20147900
捐赠科研通 7307873
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3303445
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2456279
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2311883