心理学
情感(语言学)
认知再评价
价(化学)
表达抑制
社会心理学
认知评价
人际交往
背景(考古学)
人际关系
发展心理学
临床心理学
认知
应对(心理学)
古生物学
神经科学
物理
生物
量子力学
沟通
作者
Yitong Zhao,Christian E. Waugh,Lara K. Kammrath,Qing Wang
标识
DOI:10.1080/02699931.2021.2014787
摘要
Negative interpersonal events, such as close relationship conflicts, can threaten one's affective and social well-being. To improve affect and to maintain valuable relationships, individuals could select different reappraisal tactics. One could use positive reappraisal to find potential benefits of the event (e.g. "This conflict helps our relationship grow."), or use minimising reappraisal to decrease the perceived impact of event (e.g. "This is no big deal."). These two tactics target distinct appraisal dimensions: valence versus significance. We investigated whether these two reappraisals would show similar or different profiles of affective and social effects in the context of close relationship conflicts. Study 1 was based on a sample of 90 Chinese younger adults. Study 2 was based on a sample of 237 American adults (156 MTurk workers and 81 undergraduates combined). Across two studies, both reappraisals effectively improved affect in response to a recalled conflict. Minimising reappraisal group showed significantly increased affect and relationship satisfaction (Study 1&2), but decreased conflict resolution motivation (Study 2) across time. Positive reappraisal group, on the other hand, showed less pronounced increases in positive affect but increased conflict resolution self-efficacy across time (Study 1&2). We discuss these findings by highlighting within-reappraisal variation and potential trade-offs in pursuing affective and social regulation goals.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI