Prognostic Value and Molecular Landscape of HER2 Low-Expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value and molecular landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low-expressing (HER2-L) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study enrolled patients with mCRC who had undergone surgical resection of primary tumor. Using the specimen, we evaluated HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 positivity was defined as follows: HER2 positivity (HER2-Pos) as IHC 3 + or IHC 2+/FISH positive, HER2-L as IHC 2+/FISH negative or IHC 1+, and HER2 negativity (HER2-Neg) as IHC 0+. Gene alterations were determined by next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 370 patients were analyzed, comprising 15 patients (4%) with HER2-Pos, 21 (6%) with HER2-L, and 334 (90%) with HER2-Neg disease. The clinicopathologic characteristics among groups had no differences. HER2-L had a significantly higher proportion of coaltered RAS mutation than HER2-Pos (P = .037). With a median follow-up of 101.8 months, HER2-L had a significantly better median overall survival than HER2-Pos (P = .029) (18.2 months in HER2-Pos vs. 33.3 in HER2-L vs. 27.9 in HER2-Neg). In 58 patients harboring wild-type RAS and receiving anti-EGFR antibody therapy, HER2-L had a better median progression-free survival tendency than HER2-Pos, with 2.2 months in HER2-Pos, 7.8 in HER2-L, and 5.1 in HER2-Neg (P = .036). CONCLUSION: HER2-L mCRC showed a better prognosis than HER2-Pos mCRC, and it is similar to HER2-Neg mCRC. Hence, HER2-L mCRC might have different biologic behavior in terms of prognostic value and molecular landscape of mCRC, suggesting the possibility of implementation of HER2-guided clinical development against HER2-expressing mCRC.