Critical thinking as the ability to sort and qualify the information available, to form one's own judgement

批判性思维 答辩人 判断 信息素养 社会学 认识论 心理学 社会科学 政治学 教育学 哲学 法学
作者
Elena Pasquinelli,Olivier Richard
出处
期刊:European Journal of Education [Wiley]
卷期号:58 (3): 422-433
标识
DOI:10.1111/ejed.12565
摘要

Abstract In an era marked by an excessive exposure to information and disinformation, this article explores how the public in France engages with critical thinking on the topics of scientific information and knowledge , as well as associated debates . First, a panel survey was carried out in 2022 by the science education centre Universcience in Paris in collaboration with the survey institute GECE. A total of 3,218 respondents participated in the survey in France. The survey questions focused on three themes: (1) the substantial relationship between respondents' scientific reasoning and critical thinking; (2) sources that respondents used for information, particularly on scientific subjects, to form an understanding of current events; (3) respondent relationships to discourses in the sciences and otherness in reasoning. In this study, critical thinking was defined as the ability to sort and make sense of available information and to question one's opinions. Also, the ability to discern trustworthy sources and information. In this approach, critical thinking is a condition for correctly assessing information on science topics. This is understood to include knowledge about science, its processes of knowledge production, and quality sources of information in the natural sciences. In this study, a Barometer of Critical Thinking was developed, and a survey was carried out. Survey results and the development of the barometer are described. Finally, we discuss how developing scientific literacy (knowledge about scientific facts, methods, practices and sources) is crucial in order to foster critical thinking on scientific information, knowledge, debates, and beyond.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
che完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI6.1应助ztww采纳,获得10
1秒前
王kk发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yoyo发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
思源应助着急的问凝采纳,获得10
2秒前
跳跃的寄瑶完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
陈赞发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
扬眉亮剑完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Revive完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
英勇的愚志完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
1234发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
FashionBoy应助冰冰采纳,获得10
3秒前
zjq发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Orange应助asdf采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
坚强馒头发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Jasper应助Z_jx采纳,获得10
4秒前
xiaojie2024完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
爱思考的东完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
范莉发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
che发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
LHP完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
无花果应助happy8le采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
Nexus应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
Nexus应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Nexus应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6520908
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8313974
关于积分的说明 17783619
捐赠科研通 5622942
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2927370
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1904249
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1764471