脉冲波速
医学
动脉硬化
脉搏波分析
再现性
平淡——奥特曼情节
心脏病学
危险分层
内科学
平均差
外科
核医学
协议限制
血压
统计
置信区间
数学
作者
Dario Leone,Irene Buraioli,Giulia Mingrone,Davide Lena,Alessandro Sanginario,Fabrizio Vallelonga,Francesco Tosello,Eleonora Avenatti,Marco Cesareo,Anna Astarita,Lorenzo Airale,Luca Sabia,Franco Veglio,Danilo Demarchi,Alberto Milan
标识
DOI:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002925
摘要
Background: Large artery stiffness, assessed by carotid--femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events, commonly used for risk stratification. Currently, the reference device for noninvasive cfPWV is SphygmoCor but its cost and technically challenging use limit its diffusion in clinical practice. Aim: To validate a new device for noninvasive assessment of cfPWV, ATHOS (Arterial sTiffness faitHful tOol aSsessment), designed in collaboration with the Politecnico di Torino, against the reference noninvasive method represented by SphygmoCor. Methods: Ninety healthy volunteers were recruited. In each volunteer, we assessed cfPWV, using SphygmoCor (PWV SphygmoCor ) and ATHOS (PWV ATHOS ) devices in an alternate fashion, following the ARTERY Society guidelines. The accuracy was assessed by Bland--Altman plot, and reproducibility was assessed by interoperator correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Mean PWV ATHOS and mean PWV SphygmoCor were 7.88 ± 1.96 and 7.72 ± 1.95 m/s, respectively. Mean difference between devices was 0.15 ± 0.56 m/s, with a high correlation between measurements ( r = 0.959, P < 0.001). Considering only PWV values at least 8 m/s ( n = 30), mean difference was 0.1 ± 0.63 m/s. The ICC was 97.7% with ATHOS Conclusion: ATHOS showed an excellent level of agreement with SphygmoCor, even at high PWV values, with a good reproducibility. Its simplicity of use could help increase clinical application of PWV assessment, improving patients’ cardiovascular risk stratification.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI