医学
阿替唑单抗
结直肠癌
内科学
肿瘤科
临床终点
免疫疗法
丸(消化)
化疗
DNA错配修复
临床研究阶段
随机对照试验
临床试验
泌尿科
癌症
帕尼单抗
血管内皮生长因子
外科
胃肠病学
总体生存率
完全响应
耐受性
作者
Caio M.S.P. Rocha Lima,Greg Yothers,Thomas J. George,Howard S. Höchster,Hanna K. Sanoff,Deirdre Jill Cohen,Katherine A. Guthrie,Samuel A. Jacobs,Anwaar Saeed,Scott Kopetz,Linda H. Colangelo,Tanner J. Freeman,Scott Cole,Maged Khalil,Swapna Devanna,Dan Sayam Zuckerman,Theodore S. Hong,N. Lynn Henry,Patricia A. Ganz,Charles D. Blanke
摘要
PURPOSE Immunotherapy for frontline mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is effective; however, nearly half of the patients treated with single-agent PD-1 therapy will progress within 12 months. Preclinical studies in CRC and clinical data from other cancers suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition and chemotherapy can synergize with PD-L1 inhibition. METHODS The NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610 (COMMIT) three-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomly assigned first-line dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients (1:1:1) to either: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m², and 46-hour infusional 5-FU 2,400 mg/m²)/bevacizumab (FFX/bev), or atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy (840 mg IV once every 2 weeks), or the combination of FFX/bev/atezo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat population. Because of KEYNOTE 177 results, the FFX/bev arm was closed after 20 patients were enrolled. The study continued with atezo alone versus FFX/bev/atezo, with a revised sample size of 100 patients in the two remaining arms (120 patients across all three arms). RESULTS From November 2017 to March 2025, a total of 102 patients were enrolled in the three arms: FFX/bev: n = 20, atezo: n = 41, and FFX/bev/atezo: n = 41. At a median follow-up of 46 months for the two arms (median age: 63.3 years; 47.6% female; 23.2% BRAF V600E mutated), PFS of FFX/bev/atezo was superior to that of atezo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.439 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.84]; P = .0103) and below the critical value of 0.0152. The objective response rate was 86.1% versus 46%, and the disease control rate at 12 months was 64.7% versus 32.4% in the FFX/bev/atezo arm compared with the atezo-only arm, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any attribution occurred in 52 patients (atezo: 18; combination arm: 34). CONCLUSION The combination of FFX/bev plus atezo led to significantly longer PFS compared with atezo monotherapy in the first-line treatment of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI