The Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score: a prospective validation study

克朗巴赫阿尔法 组内相关 医学 食管胃十二指肠镜检查 利克特量表 德尔菲法 可靠性(半导体) 评定量表 相关性 同时有效性 斯皮尔曼秩相关系数 物理疗法 心理测量学 统计 内部一致性 内科学 内窥镜检查 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 量子力学 数学 几何学
作者
Rishad Khan,Nikko Gimpaya,José Ignacio Vargas,Anushka Ramkissoon,Samir Seleq,Reza Gholami,Hisham J. Akhtar,Rishi Bansal,Michael A. Scaffidi,Sunil Amin,Steven Bollipo,Jan Král,Rashid N. Lui,Katarzyna M. Pawlak,Dalbir S. Sandhu,Mohammad Bilal,Enrique de‐Madaria,Keith Siau,Aline Charabaty,Almoutaz Hashim
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:55 (02): 121-128 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-1865-4180
摘要

Background Assessment of mucosal visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can be improved with a standardized scoring system. To address this need, we created the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score (TUGCS). Methods We developed the TUGCS using Delphi methodology, whereby an international group of endoscopy experts iteratively rated their agreement with proposed TUGCS items and anchors on a 5-point Likert scale. After each Delphi round, we analyzed responses and refined the TUGCS using an 80 % agreement threshold for consensus. We used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess inter-rater and test–retest reliability. We assessed internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha and item-total and inter-item correlations with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. We compared TUGCS ratings with an independent endoscopist’s global rating of mucosal visualization using Spearman’s ρ. Results We achieved consensus with 14 invited participants after three Delphi rounds. Inter-rater reliability was high at 0.79 (95 %CI 0.64–0.88). Test–retest reliability was excellent at 0.83 (95 %CI 0.77–0.87). Cronbach’s α was 0.81, item-total correlation range was 0.52–0.70, and inter-item correlation range was 0.38–0.74. There was a positive correlation between TUGCS ratings and a global rating of visualization (r = 0.41, P = 0.002). TUGCS ratings for EGDs with global ratings of excellent were significantly higher than those for EGDs with global ratings of fair (P = 0.01). Conclusion The TUGCS had strong evidence of validity in the clinical setting. The international group of assessors, broad variety of EGD indications, and minimal assessor training improves the potential for dissemination.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
北风完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
CodeCraft应助卜哥采纳,获得10
1秒前
Daisy完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
共享精神应助111采纳,获得10
1秒前
Leticia完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
aa完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
甜甜的花生完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
可爱的函函应助周周采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
illusion完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zgnh完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
文艺悟空完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
俞是虞完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小美美完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
wulala完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
shang tian bo发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
小脸儿想变大完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
阿波卡利斯完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
冯佩发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
康康完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ljjjj完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
神外第一刀完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
开放小懒虫关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
暴躁的夏烟应助Max采纳,获得10
8秒前
lhy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ldkl完成签到,获得积分0
8秒前
隐形曼青应助傻傻的丹蝶采纳,获得30
8秒前
8秒前
rdf完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
litn完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Precious完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
vinni完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
维尼完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Annie Ernaux: De la perte au corps glorieux 600
Writing Systems 500
Media Today Mass Communication in a Converging World 9th Edition 400
Understanding Modeling and Simulation of Polymerization Reactions 400
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 400
A revision of Limenitis helmanni and its related species (Nymphalidae) from Central and South China 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6832352
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8542673
关于积分的说明 18175496
捐赠科研通 6175386
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3037128
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2022660
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2014176