亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Interest of the MGAP score on in-hospital trauma patients: Comparison with TRISS, ISS and NISS scores

急诊分诊台 医学 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 损伤严重程度评分 接收机工作特性 创伤中心 急诊医学 修正创伤评分 重症监护室 回顾性队列研究 曲线下面积 严重创伤 急诊科 毒物控制 内科学 伤害预防 医疗急救 外科 精神科
作者
Emily J. Larkin,Marieke Jones,Steven D. Young,Jeffrey S. Young
出处
期刊:Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:53 (9): 3059-3064 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.024
摘要

Trauma scoring systems were created to predict mortality and enhance triage capabilities. However, efficacy of scoring systems to predict mortality and accuracy of originally reported severity thresholds remains uncertain. A single-center, retrospective study was conducted at University of Virginia (UVA), an American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center. We compared four scoring systems: MGAP (Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and arterial pressure), Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) to predict in-hospital mortality and disposition from the emergency department to higher acuity level of care including mortality (i.e. operating room, intensive care unit, morgue) versus standard floor admission using area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic analysis. Second, we examined sensitivity of these scores at standard thresholds to determine if adjustments were needed to minimize under-triage (sensitivity ≥95%). TRISS was the best predictor of mortality in a cohort of n = 16,265 with AUC of 0.920 (95% CI: 0.911-0.929, p<0.0001), followed by MGAP with AUC of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.889-0.911, p<0.0001), and finally ISS and NISS (0.830 (95% CI: 0.814-0.847) and 0.827 (95% CI: 0.809-0.844) respectively). NISS was the best predictor of high acuity disposition with an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI: 0.721-0.736, p<0.0001), followed by ISS with AUC of 0.714 (95% CI: 0.707-0.722, p<0.0001), and finally TRISS and MGAP (0.673 (95% CI: 0.665-0.682) and 0.613 (95% CI: 0.604-0.621) respectively (p<0.0001). At historic thresholds, no scoring system displayed adequate sensitivity to predict mortality, with values ranging from 73% for ISS to 80% for NISS. In conclusion, in the reported study cohort, TRISS was the best predictor of mortality while NISS was the best predictor of high acuity disposition. We also stress updating scoring system thresholds to achieve ideal sensitivity, and investigating how scoring systems derived to predict mortality perform when predicting indicators of morbidity such as disposition from the emergency department.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zzxx完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI5应助春风沂水采纳,获得10
3秒前
林梓完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高高的从波完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Hygge发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
zyjsunye完成签到 ,获得积分0
2分钟前
lyx2010完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
稻子完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
JSEILWQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
Hello应助天空之城采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
天空之城发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
6分钟前
anitachiu1104发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
实力不允许完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
7分钟前
李健应助13508104971采纳,获得10
7分钟前
8分钟前
满意人英完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
斯文的苡完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
9分钟前
001完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
滕皓轩完成签到 ,获得积分20
10分钟前
刘丰完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11分钟前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11分钟前
12分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助鲜艳的诗翠采纳,获得10
12分钟前
友好的白柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
12分钟前
李健的小迷弟应助Sandy采纳,获得10
12分钟前
人谷完成签到 ,获得积分10
13分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3777624
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3323001
关于积分的说明 10212874
捐赠科研通 3038350
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667372
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798106
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758229