Disclosure of Sexually Transmitted Infections to Sexual Partners: A Systematic Critical Literature Review

The purpose of this review was to systematically and critically evaluate the STI disclosure literature (excluding HIV disclosure literature), summarize limitations and omissions, and identify opportunities for future research. We used the Health Disclosure Decision-Making Model (DD-MM) as a guiding theoretical framework. Following PRISMA guidelines, database searches using key terms identified 387 possible articles, 32 of which ultimately met inclusion criteria for this review. Findings indicated that individuals with STIs experience a variety of negative feelings and emotions related to the prospect of disclosure. Reasons for disclosure included moral obligation, love for partner, and desire for support, whereas reasons to not disclose included fears about partner's reaction and response, fears of being rejected or broken up with, and beliefs about the lack of obligation. Disclosers used a variety of disclosure strategies, including priming messages, framing, and direct disclosure. Non-disclosers used strategies to pass as uninfected (i.e. passing), withdraw from relationships, and using outbreaks to time sexual activity. Among studies that examined disclosure timing, around half or fewer individuals disclosed or believed they should disclose prior to engaging in sexual activity. The findings indicated that relationship-related factors such as greater levels of commitment, relationship quality, length together, and feelings of closeness were important predictors of disclosure. Finally, some individuals experienced negative partner responses, whereas others experienced positive responses and relationship outcomes. Our review revealed that the experiences of receivers of STI disclosures are not well-represented in the literature. Implications for future research, education, and intervention are specified.