SNAI1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and maintains cancer stem cell-like properties in thymic epithelial tumors through the PIK3R2/p-EphA2 Axis

BACKGROUND: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are infrequent malignancies that arise from the anterior mediastinum. Therapeutic options for TETs, especially thymic carcinoma (TC), remain relatively constrained. This study aims to investigate the oncogenic hub gene and its underlying mechanisms in TETs, as well as to identify potential therapeutic targets. METHODS: Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differential gene expression (DEG) analysis were utilized to identify significant oncogenes using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. LASSO logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between hub genes and clinical parameters. The influence of the hub gene on promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), tumor progression, and regulating cancer stem cell-like properties was assessed both in vitro and in vivo. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was utilized to analyze the alterations in the tumor and its microenvironment following the administration of the hub gene's inhibitor. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was employed to validate the results. The potential mechanism was further elucidated through the utilization of Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag), RNA-sequencing, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), CUT&RUN, luciferase reporter assay, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), mass spectrometry (MS) and phosphoproteomic assays. RESULTS: SNAI1 was identified as a hub transcription factor for TETs, and its positive correlation with the invasiveness of the disease was confirmed. Subsequent experiments revealed that the upregulation of SNAI1 augmented the migration, invasion, and EMT of TET cell lines. Furthermore, we observed that the overexpression of SNAI1 sustained cancer stem cell-like properties. ScRNA-seq demonstrated that the use of a SNAI1 inhibitor inhibited the transition of macrophages from M1 to M2 phenotype, a finding further validated by multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2 (PIK3R2) was identified as one of the downstream targets of SNAI1 through CUT&Tag and RNA-sequencing, a finding validated by ChIP-qPCR, CUT&RUN-qPCR, luciferase reporter and immunofluorescence assays. Co-IP, MS and phosphoproteomic assays further confirmed that PIK3R2 directly interacted with phosphorylated EphA2 (p-EphA2), facilitating downstream GSK3β/β-catenin signaling pathway. CONCLUSION: The tumorigenic role of SNAI1 through the PIK3R2/p-EphA2 axis was preliminarily validated in TETs. A potential therapeutic strategy for TETs may involve the inhibition of SNAI1.