清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Levels of evidence backing the AAOS clinical practice guidelines

作者
Arjun K. Reddy,Jared Scott,Jake X. Checketts,Keith Fishbeck,Marshall Boose,Landon Stallings,Matt Vassar
出处
期刊:Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation [SAGE Publishing]
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1177/2210491721992533
摘要

Purpose: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons produces clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of orthopedic injuries. We examined the strength of the evidence underlying these recommendations in order to answer the following questions: (1) Have AAOS work groups improved guideline creation practices to locate evidence to generate strong recommendations? (2) Is there variability in the available evidence based on anatomic site or stage of care? (3) Has the level of evidence supporting improved over time? Methods: Twenty-two current guidelines of the Academy were examined which yielded 408 individual recommendations. These recommendations were assigned one of five strength of evidence ratings (strong, moderate, limited, inconclusive, consensus) by the guideline panel, based on the availability and quality of the supporting evidence. From these guidelines, we extracted all of the recommendations and their corresponding evidence ratings. We then classified the recommendations by stage of care, year, and anatomical site. Results: The distribution of the levels of evidence was as follows: 77 (18.9%) were based on consensus; 53 (13.0%) were inconclusive; 93 (22.8%) were based on limited evidence; 112 (27.5%) were based on moderate evidence; and 73 were based on (17.9%) strong evidence. Strong strength of evidence was found in 45.2% of the recommendations for preventive/screening/diagnostic care, 41.1% of nonsurgical treatment, 45.1% of surgical treatment, 51.1% of rehabilitation/postoperative treatment, and 45.5% of the recommendations that had mixed stages of care. Inconclusive strength of evidence was found to be prevalent from 2009–2013, but was eliminated starting in 2014. Conclusions: Only 73 (17.9%) recommendations generated by the Academy in its 22 clinical practice guidelines are based on a “strong” strength of evidence. More robust research is needed in orthopedics to bolster confidence in the recommendations in future guideline updates.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
jlwang完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
apt完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
science完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
Orange应助VISIN采纳,获得10
57秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
57秒前
v0id应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
58秒前
落寞剑成完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
VISIN完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
lily完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
冰山下的火种完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
话说dota完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Capricorn完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
耕牛热完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
zyjsunye完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
眯眯眼的安雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
老才完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
淡定的咖啡豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
CrsCrsCrs完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
wzbc完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
zzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
阿里完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
所所应助阿里采纳,获得30
5分钟前
喻初原完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
激情的冰绿完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
aspect完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
852应助开朗白易采纳,获得10
5分钟前
仪景完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
开朗白易发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
widesky777完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
水合钴离子完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
222完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
YZY完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
老实晓露完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
卓初露完成签到 ,获得积分0
6分钟前
qq191925684完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
冰凌心恋完成签到,获得积分0
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7521673
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9108664
关于积分的说明 19447349
捐赠科研通 7125189
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3254901
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2423107
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2241689