医学
再狭窄
冠状动脉再狭窄
支架
放射科
计算机断层摄影术
核医学
冠状动脉支架
探测器
冠状动脉造影
多探测器计算机断层扫描
诊断准确性
螺旋CT
断层摄影术
冠心病
作者
Doosup Shin,Rick Volleberg,Roosha Parikh,Christopher Chieh Yang Koo,Sarah Malik,Matthew Cannata,Emma Caron,Yasemin Ciftcikal,Koshiro Sakai,Jianqin Cao,Lu Chen,Fernando Sosa,Jonathan Weber,Jaffar M. Khan,David J. Cohen,Jeffrey W. Moses,Niels van Royen,Carlos Collet,Richard Shlofmitz,Evan Shlofmitz
出处
期刊:Eurointervention
[European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions]
日期:2025-09-29
卷期号:21 (19): e1137-e1146
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.4244/eij-d-25-00257
摘要
BACKGROUND: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced spatial resolution and reduced blooming artefacts, potentially improving the evaluation of stented coronary vessels. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of dual-source PCD-CT in detecting obstructive in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with prior coronary stent implantation who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with PCD-CT and subsequent invasive coronary angiography within 90 days between 2023 and 2024. Obstructive ISR (≥50% diameter stenosis) was determined by visual assessment of CCTA and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in a blinded fashion. The diagnostic performance of CCTA for ISR was compared with that of QCA. RESULTS: A total of 283 stented lesions from 171 patients were included. Of these, only 3 lesions (1.1%) were deemed indeterminate by PCD-CT. Using invasive QCA as the reference standard, PCD-CT demonstrated a lesion-level sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 90.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.4%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.9% for detecting obstructive ISR. In a subgroup analysis according to the stent diameter (<3.00 mm [n=83] vs ≥3.00 mm [n=108]), there were no significant differences in sensitivity (87.5% vs 86.7%; p=1.00), specificity (93.3% vs 92.5%; p=1.00), PPV (58.3% vs 65.0%; p=1.00), NPV (98.6% vs 97.7%; p=1.00), or overall diagnostic accuracy (92.8% vs 91.7%; p=1.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PCD-CT demonstrated good diagnostic performance for evaluating obstructive ISR using QCA as the reference standard, regardless of stent diameter.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI