Accuracy of outcome definitions in Mendelian randomisation of maternal health

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyEarly View LETTER TO THE EDITOR Accuracy of outcome definitions in Mendelian randomisation of maternal health Qian Yang, Corresponding Author Qian Yang [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-4132 MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Correspondence Qian Yang, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMaria Carolina Borges, Maria Carolina Borges MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSearch for more papers by this author Qian Yang, Corresponding Author Qian Yang [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-4132 MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Correspondence Qian Yang, MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMaria Carolina Borges, Maria Carolina Borges MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 13 November 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17713Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Ardissino M, Geddes-Barton M, Banerjee A. Genetically predicted body mass index and maternal outcomes of pregnancy: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study. BJOG. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17650 10.1111/1471-0528.17650 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023; 613: 508–518. 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance (CG192) [Internet]. Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2014 [cited 12 Sep 2023]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192 Google Scholar 4ACOG Committee Opinion No. 757: screening for perinatal depression. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132: e208–e212. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002927 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D, et al. The MR-base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018; 7:e34408. 10.7554/eLife.34408 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation