Comparative analysis of small secreted peptide signaling during defense response: insights from vascular and non‐vascular plants

Abstract Small secreted peptides (SSPs) play an important role in modulating immune responses in all land plants. However, the evolution of stress peptide signaling in different plant phyla remains poorly understood. Here, we compared the expression of SSP genes in the pathogen‐induced transcriptomes of vascular and non‐vascular plants. We found 13, 19, 15, and 28 SSP families that were differentially expressed during infection in Physcomitrium patens , Zea mays , Brassica napus , and Solanum tuberosum , respectively. A comparative study of peptide motifs and predicted three‐dimensional structures confirmed the similarity of SSPs across the examined plant species. In both vascular and non‐vascular plants. However, only the RALF peptide family was differentially regulated under infection. We also found that EPFL peptides, which are involved in growth and development processes in angiosperms, were differentially regulated in P. patens in response to pathogen infection. The search for novel immune‐specific peptides revealed a family of PSY‐like peptides that are differentially regulated during infection in P. patens . The treatment with synthetic tyrosine‐modified and non‐modified PSY, and PSY‐like peptides, as well as recombinant EPFL and MEG, validated their roles in the immune response and growth regulation. Thus, our study showed the complex nature of SSP signaling and shed light on the regulation of SSPs in different plant lineages during infection.