已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Assessing Ability for ChatGPT to Answer Total Knee Arthroplasty-Related Questions

关节置换术 清晰 骨科手术 相关性(法律) 一致性(知识库) 物理疗法 医学 外科 人工智能 计算机科学 生物化学 化学 政治学 法学
作者
Matthew L. Magruder,Ariel N. Rodriguez,Jason Wong,Orry Erez,Nicolás S. Piuzzi,Gil R. Scuderi,James Slover,Jason H. Oh,Ran Schwarzkopf,Antonia F. Chen,Richard Iorio,Stuart B. Goodman,Michael A. Mont
出处
期刊:Journal of Arthroplasty [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:39 (8): 2022-2027 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.023
摘要

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of orthopaedics has been a topic of increasing interest and opportunity in recent years. Its applications are widespread both for physicians and patients, including use in clinical decision-making, in the operating room, and in research. In this study, we aimed to assess the quality of ChatGPT answers when asked questions related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods ChatGPT prompts were created by turning 15 of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines into questions. An online survey was created, which included screenshots of each prompt and answers to the 15 questions. Surgeons were asked to grade ChatGPT answers from 1 to 5 based on their characteristics: 1) Relevance; 2) Accuracy; 3) Clarity; 4) Completeness; 5) Evidence-based; and 6) Consistency. There were eleven Adult Joint Reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons who completed the survey. Questions were subclassified based on the subject of the prompt: 1) risk factors, 2) implant/Intraoperative, and 3) pain/functional outcomes. The average and standard deviation for all answers, as well as for each subgroup, were calculated. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was also calculated. Results All answer characteristics were graded as being above average (i.e., a score > 3). Relevance demonstrated the highest scores (4.43±0.77) by surgeons surveyed, and consistency demonstrated the lowest scores (3.54±1.10). ChatGPT prompts in the Risk Factors group demonstrated the best responses, while those in the Pain/Functional Outcome group demonstrated the lowest. The overall IRR was found to be 0.33 (poor reliability), with the highest IRR for relevance (0.43) and the lowest for evidence-based (0.28). Conclusion ChatGPT can answer questions regarding well-established clinical guidelines in TKA with above-average accuracy but demonstrates variable reliability. This investigation is the first step in understanding large language model (LLM) AIs like ChatGPT and how well they perform in the field of arthroplasty.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
无私茗发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
YZ完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
anin应助Kapur采纳,获得200
5秒前
马克发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
田様应助火火火采纳,获得10
7秒前
复杂瑛发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
应稀发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
大个应助无私茗采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
应稀完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
20秒前
redflower发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
瘦瘦发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
叶落孤城完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
小昕思完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
马克完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
yunjian1583发布了新的文献求助200
35秒前
35秒前
36秒前
火火火发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
41秒前
皛皛完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
45秒前
73发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
科研通AI5应助诚心初晴采纳,获得10
46秒前
Harley完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
48秒前
Ava应助火火火采纳,获得10
48秒前
SYLH应助redflower采纳,获得10
49秒前
潜水的猪发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
51秒前
jomm发布了新的文献求助30
53秒前
DZM发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
瘦瘦完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
汉堡包应助jomm采纳,获得30
1分钟前
有魅力的书本完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Mass producing individuality 600
Разработка метода ускоренного контроля качества электрохромных устройств 500
A Combined Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Study of ε-Polylysine in the Rat 400
Advances in Underwater Acoustics, Structural Acoustics, and Computational Methodologies 300
Effect of deresuscitation management vs. usual care on ventilator-free days in patients with abdominal septic shock 200
The acute effects of performing drop jumps of different intensities on concentric squat strength 200
Erectile dysfunction From bench to bedside 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3824836
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3367137
关于积分的说明 10444489
捐赠科研通 3086408
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1698019
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 816632
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 769840