An Improved Anticancer Drug-Response Prediction Based on an Ensemble Method Integrating Matrix Completion and Ridge Regression

In this study, we proposed an ensemble learning method, simultaneously integrating a low-rank matrix completion model and a ridge regression model to predict anticancer drug response on cancer cell lines. The model was applied to two benchmark datasets, including the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC). As previous studies suggest, the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model was one of the best models by far and outperformed most state-of-the-art models. Thus, we performed a head-to-head comparison between the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model and our model by a 10-fold crossvalidation study. For the CCLE dataset, our model has a higher Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and observed drug responses than that of the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model in 18 out of 23 drugs. For the GDSC dataset, our model is better in 26 out of 28 drugs in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway and 26 out of 30 drugs in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway, respectively. Based on the prediction results, we carried out two types of case studies, which further verified the effectiveness of the proposed model on the drug-response prediction. In addition, our model is more biologically interpretable than the compared method, since it explicitly outputs the genes involved in the prediction, which are enriched in functions, like transcription, Src homology 2/3 (SH2/3) domain, cell cycle, ATP binding, and zinc finger. In this study, we proposed an ensemble learning method, simultaneously integrating a low-rank matrix completion model and a ridge regression model to predict anticancer drug response on cancer cell lines. The model was applied to two benchmark datasets, including the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC). As previous studies suggest, the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model was one of the best models by far and outperformed most state-of-the-art models. Thus, we performed a head-to-head comparison between the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model and our model by a 10-fold crossvalidation study. For the CCLE dataset, our model has a higher Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and observed drug responses than that of the dual-layer integrated cell line-drug network model in 18 out of 23 drugs. For the GDSC dataset, our model is better in 26 out of 28 drugs in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway and 26 out of 30 drugs in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway, respectively. Based on the prediction results, we carried out two types of case studies, which further verified the effectiveness of the proposed model on the drug-response prediction. In addition, our model is more biologically interpretable than the compared method, since it explicitly outputs the genes involved in the prediction, which are enriched in functions, like transcription, Src homology 2/3 (SH2/3) domain, cell cycle, ATP binding, and zinc finger.