清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Gender Differences in Entitlement: The Role of System-Justifying Beliefs

权利(公平分配) 心理学 社会心理学 集合(抽象数据类型) 经济 计算机科学 数理经济学 程序设计语言
作者
Laurie T. O’Brien,Brenda N. Major,Patricia N. Gilbert
出处
期刊:Basic and Applied Social Psychology [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:34 (2): 136-145 被引量:50
标识
DOI:10.1080/01973533.2012.655630
摘要

Abstract Two studies examine the relationship between system-justifying beliefs and perceived pay entitlement and how this relationship differs as a function of gender. In Study 1, personal endorsement of system-justifying beliefs was associated with higher levels of pay entitlement among men. In contrast, personal endorsement of system-justifying beliefs was associated with slightly, but not significantly, lower levels of pay entitlement among women. In Study 2, a system-justification prime significantly increased reports of pay entitlement among men but had no effect on reports of pay entitlement among women. Results illustrate that system-justifying beliefs contribute to the creation and maintenance of gender differences in entitlement. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Graham Talley and Brian Awe for their assistance with data collection. Notes 1A description of the results of a subset of the present data was included in a literature review on entitlement (O'Brien & Major, Citation2009). 2There were an additional seven participants between the ages of 27 and 35 who were excluded from the analyses because they qualified as outliers on age (more than 1.5 box lengths above the interquartile range). Consistent with the notion that age may be another status indicator, this group of older participants (M = 9.57) scored higher in entitlement than the younger participants (M = 8.63), t(58) = −1.89, p = .06. Including these seven participants in the analyses did not alter the interpretation of the results. 3Eighty-nine participants were originally run through the experimental procedure. We removed two participants from the data set because they objected to study procedures out of principle (taking bonus pay—one of our dependent variables). Eight more participants were removed because they indicated suspicions as to the purpose of the experiment. The degrees of freedom vary slightly between different analyses due to missing data points. *p < .05. **p < .001.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
11秒前
Zoe发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
无花果应助lian采纳,获得10
25秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
45秒前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
50秒前
1分钟前
一彤发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
领导范儿应助lian采纳,获得10
1分钟前
传奇3应助Zoe采纳,获得10
1分钟前
默默无闻完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
霜颸发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
哭泣灯泡完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
FashionBoy应助lian采纳,获得10
2分钟前
3分钟前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
小马甲应助含糊的梦芝采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Aran发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助Aran采纳,获得30
4分钟前
4分钟前
Zoe发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
我是老大应助lian采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
chiien完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
lian发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6444591
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8258492
关于积分的说明 17591155
捐赠科研通 5503940
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2901474
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1878492
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1717870