医学
内科学
心脏病学
冠状动脉扩张
传统PCI
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
冠状动脉疾病
心肌梗塞
扩张
糖尿病
冠状动脉造影
内分泌学
作者
Ziwei Xi,Hong Qiu,Tingting Guo,Yong Wang,Kefei Dou,Bo Xu,Yongjian Wu,Shubin Qiao,Weixian Yang,Yuejin Yang,Runlin Gao
出处
期刊:Angiology
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2022-04-25
卷期号:74 (1): 47-54
被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1177/00033197221091644
摘要
The clinical relevance of coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is poorly understood. We investigated the prevalence, potential predictors, and prognostic significance of CAE in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2016 to December 2018 were included and followed up for 1 year. CAE was diagnosed as an abnormal dilation >1.5-fold the diameter of adjacent normal segments on angiography. A total of 590 patients with CAE were identified from 36 790 patients undergoing PCI (overall rate of CAE: 1.6%). In multivariate analysis, variables including body mass index >30 kg/m2 (risk ratio, RR: 2.413, P = .018), ever-smoking (RR: 1.669, P < .001), hypertension (RR: 1.221, P = .025), acute myocardial infarction at admission (RR: 1.343, P = .004), no diabetes (RR: .810, P = .023), previous myocardial infarction (RR: 1.545, P < .001), no left main disease (RR: .632, P = .008) and multiple-vessel disease (RR: 1.326, P = .001), increased C-reactive protein (RR: 1.006, P = .012) were predictors of CAE. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes did not differ significantly between patients with or without CAE (P = .203). CAE is not uncommon among patients undergoing PCI in this cohort study. The presence of CAE vs its absence had no significant impact on 1-year clinical outcomes after PCI.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI