微塑料
流出物
废水
环境化学
过氧化氢
样品制备
环境科学
化学
制浆造纸工业
环境工程
色谱法
有机化学
工程类
作者
Mohammed Al-Azzawi,Oliver Knoop,Jörg E. Drewes
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2022.137082
摘要
• Small microplastics (≤10 µm) require more careful sample preparation. • Novel fluorescence and ultrasound method to generate small, tagged microplastics. • Fenton and H 2 O 2 protocols were both suitable for microplastic (1 – 10 µm) in size. The interest to monitor microplastics in various environmental matrices has grown substantially in recent years. However, monitoring microplastics remains a challenge due to interactions with complex environmental matrices, especially those rich in natural organic matter (NOM) like wastewater effluents. Therefore, sample preparation methods are needed to remove NOM and ensure minimal interference during analysis. So far, there have been only a few attempts to standardize and validate the effects of sample preparation methods on microplastics. However, no efforts exist that validated the impacts of sample preparation methods on small microplastic particles (≤10 µm). Those smaller particles might be more susceptible to adverse effects after chemical digestion as a result of the increased surface area to mass ratio, compared to their larger counterparts. In this study, pellets from six polymers were successfully tagged with a fluorescent dye and subsequently fractured using ultrasound treatment to produce small particles of tagged microplastic. The generated microplastics (≤10 µm) were then subjected to two sample preparation methods that were previously validated for wastewater effluents, namely Fenton and hydrogen peroxide oxidation. The effects on microplastics were assessed using size distribution changes, which were measured via fluorescence microscopy. Results revealed some large changes in the size distribution of microplastics (≤10 µm) after applying Fenton and hydrogen peroxide. However, these changes were largely reduced when excluding particles < 1 µm. The results indicated that, for the most part, both sample preparation methods can be used for small microplastic particles (1–10 µm), whereas hydrogen peroxide is more suitable if nanoplastics (<1 µm) are to be investigated.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI