对偶(语法数字)
护理部
培训(气象学)
磁道(磁盘驱动器)
医学
快速通道
心理学
医学教育
计算机科学
操作系统
艺术
物理
文学类
外科
气象学
作者
Wang Sa,Zewen Wu,Jing Chen,Min Zhang,Libing Sun,Yan Dong,Shuaishuai Zhou,Yuwei Wang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104295
摘要
AIM: To compare the application effects of a dual-track teaching model combining Case-based Learning (CBL) and Team-based Learning (TBL) based on the BOPPPS model in trauma care nursing training, aiming to provide references for the continuous optimization of domestic trauma care nursing training courses. BACKGROUND: Planned and targeted standardized training for trauma-related nursing staff is necessary. Trauma care training started earlier abroad than in China, highlighting a critical need to enhance the quality of trauma training. METHODS: A quasi-experimental research design was used. The control group consisted of 1267 trainees who participated in 12 sessions of CTCT®-N 1.0 training from April 2021 to May 2023, using a teaching method that combined BOPPPS-based classroom lectures with workshop demonstrations. The experimental group consisted of 1212 trainees who participated in 12 sessions of CTCT®-N 2.0 training from June to October 2023, using a dual-track teaching model based on BOPPPS, which integrated case-based classroom lectures with group team-based training. RESULTS: Post-training assessment scores for the experimental group (86.42 ± 12.27) were higher than those for the control group (74.65 ± 19.56) (t = -4.213, p < 0.001). The experimental group scored an average of 83.36 ± 9.37 in the comprehensive assessment of trauma treatment, with satisfaction ratings above 4 points. CONCLUSION: The dual-track teaching model combining CBL and TBL based on the BOPPPS framework can enhance the educational effectiveness and satisfaction of trauma care nursing training.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI