医学
拜瑞妥
狼牙棒
替卡格雷
氯吡格雷
抗血栓
内科学
随机对照试验
不利影响
华法林
相对风险
置信区间
心房颤动
阿司匹林
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
心肌梗塞
作者
Loes H. Willems,Dominique P.M.S.M. Maas,Kees Kramers,Michel M.P.J. Reijnen,Niels P. Riksen,Hugo Ten Cate,R.J. van der Vijver-Coppen,Gert J. de Borst,Barend Mees,Clark J. Zeebregts,Gerjon Hannink,Michiel C. Warlé
出处
期刊:Drugs
[Adis, Springer Healthcare]
日期:2022-08-01
卷期号:82 (12): 1287-1302
被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1007/s40265-022-01756-6
摘要
Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ASA plus ticagrelor, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban are superior to ASA monotherapy and equally effective to one another in preventing MACE in PAD. Of these four therapies, only ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban provides a higher risk of major bleedings. More than 3 months after peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban is superior in preventing MACE and MALE compared to ASA but again at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding, while other treatment regimens show non-superiority. Based on the current evidence, clopidogrel may be considered the antithrombotic therapy of choice for most PAD patients, while in patients who underwent a peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban could be considered for the long-term (> 3 months) prevention of MACE and MALE.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI