Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multicenter, randomized, non‐inferiority, phase III trial

医学 多中心研究 内窥镜检查 随机对照试验 内科学 胃肠病学
作者
Shaohui Chen,Tangmi Yuan,Jiao Zhang,Hua Bai,Ming Tian,Chuxiong Pan,Hongguang Bao,Xiaoju Jin,Fuhai Ji,Tai-di Zhong,Qiang Wang,Jianrui Lv,Sheng Wang,Yujuan Li,Yonghao Yu,Ailin Luo,Xiang‐Kui Li,Su Min,Lin Li,Xiaohua Zou
出处
期刊:Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Wiley]
卷期号:36 (2): 474-481 被引量:211
标识
DOI:10.1111/jgh.15188
摘要

Abstract Background and Aim Remimazolam tosilate (RT) is a new short‐acting GABA(A) receptor agonist, having potential to be an effective option for procedural sedation. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of RT with propofol in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods This positive‐controlled, non‐inferiority, phase III trial recruited patients at 17 centers, between September 2017 and November 2017. A total of 384 patients scheduled to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive RT or propofol. Primary endpoint was the success rate of sedation. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate safety. Results The success rate of sedation in the RT group was non‐inferior to that in the propofol group (97.34% vs 100.00%; difference in rate −2.66%, 95% CI −4.96 to −0.36, meeting criteria for non‐inferiority). Patients in the RT group had longer time to adequate sedation ( P < 0.0001) but shorter time to fully alert ( P < 0.0001) than that in the propofol group. The incidences of hypotension (13.04% vs 42.86%, P < 0.0001), treatment‐related hypotension (0.54% vs 5.82%, P < 0.0001), and respiratory depression (1.09% vs 6.88%, P = 0.0064) were significantly lower in the RT group. AEs were reported in 74 (39.15%) patients in the RT group and 114 (60.32%) patients in the propofol group, with significant difference ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion This trial established non‐inferior sedation success rate of RT compared with propofol. RT allows faster recovery from sedation compared with propofol. The safety profile is favorable and appears to be superior to propofol, indicating that it was feasible and well tolerated for patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
hi完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
蜗牛123发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
inkk77发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
香蕉觅云的应助被鸢尾绘画采纳,获得10
1秒前
小栋发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
欣宇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
didi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
娃哈哈仙女子完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Akim的应助被Gj采纳,获得10
2秒前
fan发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
Yuson_L完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
林林完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
张志迪发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
华曦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
星语完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
坚强的听枫完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
CP完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
luo完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
极限001的应助被哆啦哆啦采纳,获得30
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
molihuakai的应助被眉间尺采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
ding的应助被我要积分采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
忧郁小霜完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
今后的应助被超级绮波采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
tans发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, 14 Volume Set, 2nd Edition(本书共14册,本求助8volume-14volume共7册,独立harcover版本,非网络版本e-EROS 版,不能网络版转化PDF或提取PDF) 2000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 1000
Электротехническая система магнитожидкостной герметизации валов регулируемых электродвигателей 800
日本語と中国語及びチベット・ビルマ語の語源関連性に関する分析 800
Practical Manual of Forensic Psychophysiology: Methodology, Execution, and Fields of Application 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis, Second Edition by Robert E. Longacre 666
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 心理学 人工智能 细胞生物学 光电子学 无机化学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7949676
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9427744
关于积分的说明 20988181
捐赠科研通 7532949
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3368751
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2504978
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2400717