In‑hospital outcomes of rotational versus orbital atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta‑analysis

Data comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) with orbital atherectomy (OA) for calcified lesions is inconclusive and based on single observational studies in populations with limited numbers of patients.The aim of the study was to perform a meta‑analysis of observational studies comparing RA with OA for calcified lesions prior to percutaneous coronary intervention.Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing short‑term outcomes of RA with OA prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. Risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random‑effects model.Meta‑analysis included 6 retrospective studies with 1590 patients treated with RA and 721 with OA. The latter was associated with shorter fluoroscopy time (MD, -3.40 min; 95% CI, -4.76 to -2.04; P <0.001, I2 = 0%), but contrast use was similar (MD, -2.78 ml; 95% CI, -16.04 to 10.47; P = 0.68; I2 = 67%). Although coronary dissection occurred 4‑fold more frequently with OA (RR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.37-10.93; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%), perforations (RR, 2.73; 95% CI, 0.46-16.30, P = 0.27; I2 = 41), tamponade (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.37-8.58; P = 0.47; I2 = 0%), and slow or no‑reflow phenomenon (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.35-1.84; P = 0.61; I2 = 0%) occurred with similar frequency. The risk of 30‑day or in‑hospital myocardial infarction was lower in OA as compared with RA (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%), yet the risk of in‑hospital mortality (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.11-4.64; P = 0.74; I2 = 43%) and length of stay (MD, -0.27 days; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.23; P = 0.29; I2 = 0%) did not differ.Orbital atherectomy was associated with a lower risk of early myocardial infarction. However, a higher rate of coronary dissections produced by OA did not translate into increased risk of perforations, slow or no‑reflow phenomenon, or in‑hospital mortality.