吞吐量
工艺工程
过程(计算)
设计质量
产量(工程)
计算机科学
过程分析技术
滤波器(信号处理)
色谱法
过程开发
材料科学
化学
在制品
工程类
化学工程
运营管理
操作系统
粒径
冶金
计算机视觉
无线
电信
作者
Jessika Feliciano,Alex Berrill,Mattias Ahnfelt,Eggert Brekkan,Brad Evans,Ziawei Fung,Ranga Godavarti,Kristina Nilsson‐Välimaa,Jeff Salm,Umay Saplakoglu,Mary Switzer,K. Lacki
标识
DOI:10.1002/elsc.201400241
摘要
In the biopharmaceutical industry, well‐executed process development and characterization studies ensure robust manufacturing processes. In conventional chromatography, these studies are carried out in series with ≥10 mL bed volumes, thus requiring large quantities of feed material and operator oversight. For that reason, the screening of large process spaces becomes very expensive and has the potential to negatively impact other projects in a company's portfolio competing for similar resources. In this study, we evaluated the ability of the three high‐throughput process development formats 96‐well filter plates, pipette tips, and mini columns to reduce resources in a late‐phase process characterization Protein A capture step. The study used a Protein A capture step with a single experimental design, mAb feed material, and analytical package. The evaluation was based on how identical batch and dynamic process parameters impacted the quality and process performance attributes of monomer purity, host cell protein levels, and yield. All formats were able to provide similar models for product yield and monomer purity. Except for practical limitations of PreDictor plates, all formats could identify significant factors for host cell protein levels. RoboColumn units enabled dynamic factor evaluation and the results were the most comparable to conventional chromatography.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI