观察研究
因果推理
因果关系
因果关系(物理学)
因果模型
统计推断
计量经济学
推论
因果结构
计算机科学
心理学
数据科学
认识论
统计
数学
人工智能
哲学
物理
量子力学
标识
DOI:10.1177/2515245917745629
摘要
Correlation does not imply causation; but often, observational data are the only option, even though the research question at hand involves causality. This article discusses causal inference based on observational data, introducing readers to graphical causal models that can provide a powerful tool for thinking more clearly about the interrelations between variables. Topics covered include the rationale behind the statistical control of third variables, common procedures for statistical control, and what can go wrong during their implementation. Certain types of third variables—colliders and mediators—should not be controlled for because that can actually move the estimate of an association away from the value of the causal effect of interest. More subtle variations of such harmful control include using unrepresentative samples, which can undermine the validity of causal conclusions, and statistically controlling for mediators. Drawing valid causal inferences on the basis of observational data is not a mechanistic procedure but rather always depends on assumptions that require domain knowledge and that can be more or less plausible. However, this caveat holds not only for research based on observational data, but for all empirical research endeavors.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI