An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL-IPI): a meta-analysis of individual patient data

医学 人口 肿瘤科 单变量 队列 内科学 临床试验 多元分析 单变量分析 梅德林 多元统计 统计 数学 环境卫生 政治学 法学
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier]
卷期号:17 (6): 779-790 被引量:469
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30029-8
摘要

Background The management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is currently undergoing improvements due to novel therapies and a plethora of biological and genetic variables that add prognostic information to the classic clinical staging systems. We established an international consortium with the aim to create an international prognostic index for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL-IPI) that integrates the major prognostic parameters. Methods We used results from a systematic search of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group of MEDLINE, Embase, and Central databases for prospective, clinical phase 2 and 3 trials of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, published between Jan 1, 1950, and Dec 31, 2010, which identified 13 trials. We contacted the principal investigators of these 13 trials, of which eight agreed to include individual patient data. We used the individual patient data from these phase 3 trials from France, Germany, Poland, the UK, and the USA to create the full analysis dataset. The full analysis dataset was randomly divided, using a random sample procedure, into training and internal-validation datasets. We did a univariate analysis and multivariate analyses using 27 baseline factors and overall survival as an endpoint. We assigned weighted risk scores to each factor included in the final multivariable model. We assessed the discriminatory value using C-statistics and also the validity and reproducibility of the CLL-IPI by subgroup analysis. We used two additional datasets from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA; MAYO cohort) and the SCALE Scandinavian population-based case-control study (SCAN cohort) as the external-validation datasets. Findings 3472 treatment-naive patients were included in the full analysis dataset; 2308 were randomly segregated into the training dataset and 1164 into the internal-validation dataset. 838 patients were included in the MAYO cohort and 416 in the SCAN cohort. Median age of patients in the full analysis dataset was 61 years (range 27–86). Five independent prognostic factors were identified in the training dataset: TP53 status (no abnormalities vs del[17p] or TP53 mutation or both), IGHV mutational status (mutated vs unmutated), serum β2-microglobulin concentration (≤3·5 mg/L vs >3·5 mg/L), clinical stage (Binet A or Rai 0 vs Binet B–C or Rai I–IV), and age (≤65 years vs >65 years). Using a weighted grading of the independent factors, a prognostic index was derived that identified four risk groups within the training dataset with significantly different overall survival at 5 years: low (93·2% [95% CI 90·5–96·0]), intermediate (79·3% [75·5–83·2]), high (63·3% [57·9–68·8]), and very high risk (23·3% [12·5–34·1]; log-rank test comparing survival across the four risk groups p<0·0001; C-statistic, c=0·723 [95% CI 0·684–0·752]). These risk groups were confirmed in the internal-validation and external-validation datasets. Interpretation The CLL-IPI combines genetic, biochemical, and clinical parameters into a prognostic model, discriminating four prognostic subgroups. The CLL-IPI will allow a more targeted management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in clinical practice and in trials testing novel drugs. Funding José Carreras Leukaemia Foundation The management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is currently undergoing improvements due to novel therapies and a plethora of biological and genetic variables that add prognostic information to the classic clinical staging systems. We established an international consortium with the aim to create an international prognostic index for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL-IPI) that integrates the major prognostic parameters. We used results from a systematic search of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group of MEDLINE, Embase, and Central databases for prospective, clinical phase 2 and 3 trials of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, published between Jan 1, 1950, and Dec 31, 2010, which identified 13 trials. We contacted the principal investigators of these 13 trials, of which eight agreed to include individual patient data. We used the individual patient data from these phase 3 trials from France, Germany, Poland, the UK, and the USA to create the full analysis dataset. The full analysis dataset was randomly divided, using a random sample procedure, into training and internal-validation datasets. We did a univariate analysis and multivariate analyses using 27 baseline factors and overall survival as an endpoint. We assigned weighted risk scores to each factor included in the final multivariable model. We assessed the discriminatory value using C-statistics and also the validity and reproducibility of the CLL-IPI by subgroup analysis. We used two additional datasets from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA; MAYO cohort) and the SCALE Scandinavian population-based case-control study (SCAN cohort) as the external-validation datasets. 3472 treatment-naive patients were included in the full analysis dataset; 2308 were randomly segregated into the training dataset and 1164 into the internal-validation dataset. 838 patients were included in the MAYO cohort and 416 in the SCAN cohort. Median age of patients in the full analysis dataset was 61 years (range 27–86). Five independent prognostic factors were identified in the training dataset: TP53 status (no abnormalities vs del[17p] or TP53 mutation or both), IGHV mutational status (mutated vs unmutated), serum β2-microglobulin concentration (≤3·5 mg/L vs >3·5 mg/L), clinical stage (Binet A or Rai 0 vs Binet B–C or Rai I–IV), and age (≤65 years vs >65 years). Using a weighted grading of the independent factors, a prognostic index was derived that identified four risk groups within the training dataset with significantly different overall survival at 5 years: low (93·2% [95% CI 90·5–96·0]), intermediate (79·3% [75·5–83·2]), high (63·3% [57·9–68·8]), and very high risk (23·3% [12·5–34·1]; log-rank test comparing survival across the four risk groups p<0·0001; C-statistic, c=0·723 [95% CI 0·684–0·752]). These risk groups were confirmed in the internal-validation and external-validation datasets. The CLL-IPI combines genetic, biochemical, and clinical parameters into a prognostic model, discriminating four prognostic subgroups. The CLL-IPI will allow a more targeted management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in clinical practice and in trials testing novel drugs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
建议保存本图,每天支付宝扫一扫(相册选取)领红包
实时播报
海里发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
传奇3应助殷勤的小鸽子采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
6秒前
个性的紫菜应助哈先生采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助墨韵采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
ming发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
海里完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
sutharsons应助机智冬瓜采纳,获得30
11秒前
坚强的广山应助GZX采纳,获得10
12秒前
殷勤的小鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
羌活给羌活的求助进行了留言
15秒前
个性的紫菜应助7t采纳,获得30
18秒前
TuTu驳回了打打应助
19秒前
22秒前
FW完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
aowu完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
ppat5012完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
爪子发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
30秒前
Leo完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
34秒前
Lee完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
我是老大应助So今天吃啥采纳,获得10
34秒前
所所应助hhllhh啊采纳,获得10
36秒前
个性的紫菜应助7t采纳,获得30
38秒前
39秒前
合适忆南完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
羌活发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
43秒前
JamesPei应助mg采纳,获得10
43秒前
45秒前
Biggoose发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
面向杂志编论文给匿名的求助进行了留言
48秒前
hhllhh啊发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
高分求助中
【重要提醒】请驳回机器人应助,等待人工应助!!!! 20000
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 1000
Multifunctionality Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 500
grouting procedures for ground source heat pump 500
A Monograph of the Colubrid Snakes of the Genus Elaphe 300
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 300
The Chemistry of Carbonyl Compounds and Derivatives 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2340738
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2033170
关于积分的说明 5084907
捐赠科研通 1777717
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 888956
版权声明 556158
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 474014