协同生产
愿景
技术官僚
背景(考古学)
技术评估
规范性
社会影响评估
公民新闻
技术与社会
社会变革
社会学
社会技术
工程伦理学
政治学
知识管理
公共关系
计算机科学
社会哲学
社会科学
工程类
法学
生物
人类学
政治
古生物学
作者
A. Wendy Russell,Frank Vanclay,Heather J. Aslin
标识
DOI:10.3152/146155110x498843
摘要
Traditional expert (or technocratic) approaches to Technology Assessment have been fundamentally challenged by two observations. The first is that social impacts are not side effects of technology; they are core dimensions of new technology and technological development, and are a function of the coproduction of technology and society. As such, they can only be understood in social, not technical terms. Secondly, technological developments are driven by particular visions for society that are normative. Because these visions (and the latent premises that underpin them) are implicit and not negotiated by society, they are, in effect, undemocratic. Participatory methods have been utilized by Technology Assessment to improve the evaluation of the social and ethical dimensions of technology, and to democratize decision making about science and technology. However, we argue that public participation on its own does not necessarily lead to deeper understandings of social effects, nor necessarily to democratic input into decision making. We therefore make a case for a new form of Technology Assessment which we call TASC — Technology Assessment in Social Context. It takes a constructive, social systems approach to assess technology in social context and seeks to shape technology and social contexts through information, interaction and dialogue.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI