Comparison of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography in Prostate Cancer Detection

The aim of the study was to compare strain elastography with shear wave elastography in prostate cancer detection by comparing data gained during elastography with histological analysis after prostatectomy. Thirty patients with prostate cancer qualified for radical prostatectomy were enrolled into the study. All patients underwent transrectal strain elastography and shear wave elastography during pre-surgical evaluation. In each prostate, 36 regions were evaluated separately whether there was a suspicious prostate cancer lesion or not. Subsequently, the same regions were analyzed during histological analysis of the resected gland. Strain elastography and shear wave elastography (overall stiffness cutoff value = 35 kPa) in our study were characterized by overall sensitivities of 58.9% and 65.3% and specificities of 71.8% and 70.2%, respectively. Cutoff values specific to the zones in the shear wave elastography examination (peripheral zone: 35 kPa, transitional zone: 45 kPa) were characterized by an overall prostate cancer detection sensitivity and specificity of 63.4% and 73% respectively. Shear wave elastography examination revealed a higher sensitivity versus strain elastography, 63.4% versus 58.9% (p = 0.038, p < 0.05), and comparable specificity, 73.0% versus 71.8% (p = 0.547, p > 0.05), respectively. Sensitivity in prostate cancer detection for both methods is higher for larger lesions (except Gleason score 5 massive lesions in strain elastography). Controversially we observed a decrease in sensitivity for strain elastography in the detection of lesions with a large diameter and a Gleason score of 5 near the prostate capsule. Overall sensitivity in the diagnosis of prostate cancer is more significant for shear wave elastography versus strain elastography.