10% Body weight (gain) change as criterion for the maximum tolerated dose: A critical analysis

毒性 背景(考古学) 体重 最大耐受剂量 致癌物 体重增加 毒理 医学 生理学 内科学 生物 遗传学 古生物学
作者
Damiën van Berlo,Marjolijn Woutersen,André Müller,Marja E.J. Pronk,Jelle Vriend,Betty Hakkert
出处
期刊:Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:134: 105235-105235 被引量:42
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105235
摘要

The concept of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was introduced in the seventies for carcinogenicity testing and was defined as the highest dose inducing clear toxicity, but not mortality by causes other than cancer. As estimation of the MTD in a carcinogenicity study, the highest dose that causes a 10% decrease in body weight compared to control animals over the course of a 90-day study, was formulated as a suitable criterion. This criterion was not seen as indicator of excessive toxicity but as a means to avoid false negative outcomes in a carcinogenicity study, as tumor formation may be reduced when body weight is significantly decreased. The body weight-based MTD criterion, however, turned up in carcinogenicity test guidelines and guidance (e.g., from OECD) as the highest dose that causes a 10% decrease in body weight gain relative to controls. Moreover, the 10% decrease in body weight gain criterion for MTD also ended up in test guidelines and guidances for toxicity endpoints other than carcinogenicity, so outside the context it was intended for. A 10% decrease in body weight gain relative to controls is however not a biologically relevant effect as it corresponds to less than 3% body weight reduction relative to controls in a 90-day study, which is within the normal variation in body weight. It therefore should certainly not be considered as a condition of excessive toxicity. Using the 10% lower weight gain criterion and incorrectly associating it with excessive toxicity has major implications for top dose selection in regulatory safety studies, resulting in tests performed at doses too low to elicit toxicity. This negatively impacts the reliability of studies and their regulatory usability; moreover, it results in a waste of experimental animals, which is ethically highly undesirable. Hence, our plea is to remove this MTD criterion for top dose selection in test guidelines and guidances for toxicity endpoints other than carcinogenicity and to reinstall the original 10% decrease in body weight criterion in test guidelines and guidances for carcinogenicity.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
真实的芒果完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
WY完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乐乐应助yesuseen采纳,获得10
2秒前
JM完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
今天你要学习吗完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
悄悄完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
徐xu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Dylan发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
雷欣儿发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
共享精神应助良朋采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
侯明明发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
fan完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
rm发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
酷波er应助shouying采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
乐乐应助立麦采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
Owen应助LL采纳,获得10
7秒前
满意血茗完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
X悦完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
汉堡包应助务实金毛采纳,获得10
8秒前
烤肉发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
辣条我有呀完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zoom完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
ANmin完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
HuYu关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
EBA发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
吼吼发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
研友_VZGVzn完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7761731
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9306636
关于积分的说明 20295691
捐赠科研通 7346258
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3313246
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2463476
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2327547