A system-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake.

医学 粪便潜血 随机对照试验 退伍军人事务部 优势比 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 内科学 逻辑回归 物理疗法 癌症
作者
Richard M. Hoffman,Steel,Yee Ef,Larry Massie,Ronald M. Schrader,Moffett Ml,Glen H Murata
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号:17 (1): 49-55 被引量:23
链接
标识
摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mailing guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs) directly to patients who are due for colorectal cancer screening would achieve higher screening uptake than using visit-based screening. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative effectiveness analysis. METHODS: We used an electronic medical record to identify 7053 New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System patients aged 50 to 80 years who were due for screening in 2008. We invited 3869 randomly selected patients to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing adherence with different fecal blood tests; 202 intervention patients were assigned to receive mailed gFOBTs. We identified the following 3 control groups who could receive only visit-based colorectal cancer screening: 3184 individuals who were not invited for the randomized controlled trial (control group 1), 2525 individuals who did not respond to invitations to participate in the randomized controlled trial (control group 2), and 255 individuals who could not be contacted (control group 3). We measured gFOBT screening within 3 months after enrollment in the intervention group, as well as gFOBT or colonoscopy screening within 6 months of identification as a control subject. We compared screening across groups using multivariate logistic regression analysis to adjust for sex, race/ethnicity, clinic site, previous gFOBT, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Colorectal screening occurred less often in each of the control groups (in 18.6% of control group 1, in 14.3% of control group 2, and in 18.8% of control group 3) than among patients mailed a gFOBT (48.5%). Adjusted odds ratios for screening among the control groups were all less than in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratios, 0.25, 0.19, and 0.23, respectively; all, P <.001). CONCLUSION: Using an electronic medical record to identify screening-eligible patients and mailing them gFOBT cards achieved higher colorectal screening uptake than performing visit-based screening.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
细心白凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
无花果应助Aimeee采纳,获得10
2秒前
华仔应助Hino采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
甜菜发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
freeze完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
宓人英完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
moonlight完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
情怀应助halfsugar采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
情怀应助林宝采纳,获得20
6秒前
一品红发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
东东发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Lucas应助wqh666采纳,获得10
10秒前
倾沐流年完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
13秒前
15秒前
NexusExplorer应助甜菜采纳,获得10
15秒前
领导范儿应助tong童采纳,获得10
16秒前
传奇3应助axil1ft采纳,获得10
16秒前
风趣青槐完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
震动的芷珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
halfsugar发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
白叶与茶完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
壮观的可以完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
简单海露应助悄悄采纳,获得10
24秒前
秋风应助阿都采纳,获得10
25秒前
科研通AI6.4应助1qq采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
gulu发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7747893
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9296156
关于积分的说明 20233764
捐赠科研通 7329274
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3308742
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460494
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2320694