皮密莫司
他克莫司
医学
耐受性
红斑
皮肤病科
特应性皮炎
不利影响
过敏性
瘙痒的
钙调神经磷酸酶
过敏
入射(几何)
随机对照试验
外科
药理学
移植
免疫学
物理
光学
作者
Steven Kempers,Mark Boguniewicz,Eric Carter,Michael Jarratt,David M. Pariser,Dan Stewart,Matt Stiller,Eduardo Tschen,Katie Chon,Steve Wisseh,Beatrice Abrams
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.051
摘要
Objective To evaluate pimecrolimus cream 1% and tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods 141 patients (aged 2-17 years) were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 71) or tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (n = 70) twice daily for 6 weeks. Results At day 4, local, application-site reactions were less common and of shorter duration with pimecrolimus than with tacrolimus. Incidence of erythema/irritation was 8% (6/71) with pimecrolimus compared with 19% (13/70) with tacrolimus (P = .039). Fewer patients receiving pimecrolimus (0%, 0/6) experienced erythema/irritation lasting >30 minutes, compared with those receiving tacrolimus (85%, 11/13; P < .001). Fewer patients reported itching with pimecrolimus (8%; 6/71) than with tacrolimus (20%; 14/70; P = .073). Incidence of warmth, stinging, and burning was similar in both groups; however, reactions lasting >30 minutes were fewer with pimecrolimus (0%, 0/14) than with tacrolimus (67%, 8/12; P < .001). More patients receiving pimecrolimus rated ease of application as ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’, compared with tacrolimus (76% vs 59%, respectively; P < .020). Efficacy was similar in both groups at day 43. Both treatments were generally well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. Conclusion Pimecrolimus cream 1% had better formulation attributes and local tolerability than tacrolimus ointment 0.03% while providing similar efficacy and overall safety in pediatric patients with moderate AD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI