牙膏
三氯生
氟化物
搪瓷漆
牙科
氟化钠
医学
口腔卫生
随机对照试验
橙汁
化学
食品科学
内科学
病理
无机化学
作者
Nicola West,Nikki Hellin,Rachelle Eusebio,Tao He
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2019-06-01
卷期号:32 (3): 138-142
被引量:2
摘要
To compare the enamel protection efficacy of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice to a triclosan-containing sodium fluoride dentifrice using a 10-day in situ erosion model, in accordance with the American Dental Association Seal of Acceptance guidelines for enamel erosion control.In this single-center, double-blind, randomized, supervised-usage, two-treatment, four-period, crossover study, healthy adult subjects were randomized to a treatment sequence involving the following products: a 0.454% stannous fluoride (1,100 ppm F) dentifrice (Procter & Gamble) and a control dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride (1,100 ppm F) and 0.3% triclosan (Colgate-Palmolive). Each study period consisted of 10 treatment days. Subjects wore an intra-oral appliance fitted with two polished human enamel samples for 6 hours per treatment day. While wearing the appliance, subjects swished with their assigned dentifrice slurry for 60 seconds twice daily and with 250 ml orange juice over a 10-minute period four times daily. After 10 days, enamel specimens were removed and measured for surface loss using contact profilometry.36 subjects were enrolled and 33 completed the study (mean age = 41.8 years). The stannous fluoride dentifrice demonstrated 90.3% less enamel loss than the NaF/triclosan dentifrice (P < 0.001) at Day 10, with median enamel loss of 0.279 µm and 2.877 µm, respectively. Both products were well tolerated.The stannous fluoride dentifrice provided significantly greater protection against dental erosion relative to the NaF/triclosan dentifrice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI