Changes in Olfactory Bulb Volume in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

作者
Jia Li,GU Cheng-zhi,Jianbin Su,Lianhai Zhu,Yong Zhou,Huai-yu Huang,Chun‐Feng Liu
出处
期刊:PLOS ONE [Public Library of Science]
卷期号:11 (2): e0149286-e0149286 被引量:92
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149286
摘要

OBJECTIVE: The changes in olfactory bulb (OB) volume in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients have not yet been comprehensively evaluated. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore whether the OB volume was significantly different between PD patients and healthy controls. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched up to March 6, 2015 with no language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies and extracted data on study characteristics and OB volume. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model were conducted. Publication bias was determined by using funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess possible sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Six original case-control studies of 216 PD patients and 175 healthy controls were analyzed. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) in the OB volume between the PD patients and the healthy participants was -8.071 for the right OB and -10.124 for the left OB; these values indicated a significant difference among PD patients compared with healthy controls. In addition, a significant difference in the lateralized OB volume was observed in PD patients, with a pooled WMD of 1.618; these results indicated a larger right OB volume than left OB volume in PD patients. In contrast, no difference in the lateralized OB volume was found in healthy controls. No statistical evidence of publication bias among studies was found based on Egger's or Begg's tests. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were consistent and robust. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both the left and the right OB volume were significantly smaller in PD patients than in healthy controls. However, significant heterogeneity and an insufficient number of studies underscore the need for further observational research.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
我爱看文献完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Ava应助ly采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
细心妙竹完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
张欢馨应助大智若愚啊采纳,获得10
6秒前
随风走发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
冰淇淋完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
Tao发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
榛糕李完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
LXX发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
zoe发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
lozz完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Mira完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
大宝发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
在水一方应助LXX采纳,获得10
20秒前
ppboyindream发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Soen发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
小子一阿一完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Dolores完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
LunminBao完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
wanci应助ywd采纳,获得10
22秒前
李健的小迷弟应助123采纳,获得10
23秒前
SanXing三醒发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
搜集达人应助zoe采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
甜美坤完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7607357
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9183238
关于积分的说明 19669614
捐赠科研通 7181509
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3269774
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2433596
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2264132