Nurse and Social Worker Palliative Telecare Team and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD, Heart Failure, or Interstitial Lung Disease

医学 缓和医疗 生活质量(医疗保健) 人口 慢性阻塞性肺病 肺科医师 随机对照试验 间质性肺病 社会心理的 心力衰竭 护理部 物理疗法 家庭医学 重症监护医学 内科学 精神科 环境卫生
作者
David B. Bekelman,William J. Feser,Brianne Morgan,Carolyn H. Welsh,Elizabeth C. Parsons,Grady Paden,Anna E. Barón,Brack Hattler,Connor McBryde,Andrew Cheng,Allison V. Lange,David H. Au
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:331 (3): 212-212 被引量:75
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.24035
摘要

Importance: Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure (HF), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) endure poor quality of life despite conventional therapy. Palliative care approaches may benefit this population prior to end of life. Objective: Determine the effect of a nurse and social worker palliative telecare team on quality of life in outpatients with COPD, HF, or ILD compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-blind, 2-group, multisite randomized clinical trial with accrual between October 27, 2016, and April 2, 2020, in 2 Veterans Administration health care systems (Colorado and Washington), and including community-based outpatient clinics. Outpatients with COPD, HF, or ILD at high risk of hospitalization or death who reported poor quality of life participated. Intervention: The intervention involved 6 phone calls with a nurse to help with symptom management and 6 phone calls with a social worker to provide psychosocial care. The nurse and social worker met weekly with a study primary care and palliative care physician and as needed, a pulmonologist, and cardiologist. Usual care included an educational handout developed for the study that outlined self-care for COPD, ILD, or HF. Patients in both groups received care at the discretion of their clinicians, which could include care from nurses and social workers, and specialists in cardiology, pulmonology, palliative care, and mental health. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was difference in change in quality of life from baseline to 6 months between the intervention and usual care groups (FACT-G score range, 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life, clinically meaningful change ≥4 points). Secondary quality-of-life outcomes at 6 months included disease-specific health status (Clinical COPD Questionnaire; Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) symptoms. Results: Among 306 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 68.9 [7.7] years; 276 male [90.2%], 30 female [9.8%]; 245 White [80.1%]), 177 (57.8%) had COPD, 67 (21.9%) HF, 49 (16%) both COPD and HF, and 13 (4.2%) ILD. Baseline FACT-G scores were similar (intervention, 52.9; usual care, 52.7). FACT-G completion was 76% (intervention, 117 of 154; usual care, 116 of 152) at 6 months for both groups. Mean (SD) length of intervention was 115.1 (33.4) days and included a mean of 10.4 (3.3) intervention calls per patient. In the intervention group, 112 of 154 (73%) patients received the intervention as randomized. At 6 months, mean FACT-G score improved 6.0 points in the intervention group and 1.4 points in the usual care group (difference, 4.6 points [95% CI, 1.8-7.4]; P = .001; standardized mean difference, 0.41). The intervention also improved COPD health status (standardized mean difference, 0.44; P = .04), HF health status (standardized mean difference, 0.41; P = .01), depression (standardized mean difference, -0.50; P < .001), and anxiety (standardized mean difference, -0.51; P < .001) at 6 months. Conclusions and Relevance: For adults with COPD, HF, or ILD who were at high risk of death and had poor quality of life, a nurse and social worker palliative telecare team produced clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life at 6 months compared with usual care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02713347.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
堃kun发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
金秋完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
jiayou完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
图图to发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
桐桐应助狂野雅彤采纳,获得10
5秒前
梦梦发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
1234发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
香芋完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
地球发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
舒心的向卉完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
CodeCraft应助zzzxxx采纳,获得10
8秒前
Mircale完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
苏苏完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
LZY完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
HJJHJH发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
14秒前
14秒前
852应助1234采纳,获得10
15秒前
菲利克斯博完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
共享精神应助开放世界采纳,获得30
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
踏实樱桃发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7595908
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9172524
关于积分的说明 19635642
捐赠科研通 7173066
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3267916
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432676
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261056