公共物品
惩罚(心理学)
公共物品游戏
收益
随机博弈
结果(博弈论)
动作(物理)
集体行动
微观经济学
强互惠
经济
社会困境
理想(伦理)
重复博弈
社会心理学
心理学
公共经济学
博弈论
政治学
会计
物理
政治
法学
量子力学
作者
David G. Rand,Anna Dreber,Tore Ellingsen,Drew Fudenberg,Martin A. Nowak
出处
期刊:Science
[American Association for the Advancement of Science]
日期:2009-09-03
卷期号:325 (5945): 1272-1275
被引量:704
标识
DOI:10.1126/science.1177418
摘要
Carrots Are Better Than Sticks The challenge of dealing with freeloaders—who benefit from a common good but refuse to pay their “fair share” of the costs—has often been met in theoretical and laboratory studies by sanctioning costly punishment, in which contributors pay a portion of their benefit so that freeloaders lose theirs. Rand et al. (p. 1272 ; see the news story by Pennisi and the cover) added a private interaction session after each round of the public goods game during which participants were allowed to reward or punish other members of their group. The outcome showed that reward was as effective as punishment in maintaining a cooperative mindset, and doing so via rewarding interactions allowed the entire group to prosper because less is lost to the costs of punishing.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI