创造力
心理学
晋升(国际象棋)
社会心理学
说服性沟通
说服
应用心理学
政治学
政治
法学
作者
Ronald Friedman,Jens Förster
标识
DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
摘要
This study tested whether cues associated with promotion and prevention regulatory foci influence creativity. The authors predicted that the risky, explorative processing style elicited by promotion cues, relative to the risk-averse, perseverant processing style elicited by prevention cues, would facilitate creative thought. These predictions were supported by two experiments in which promotion cues bolstered both creative insight (Experiment 1) and creative generation (Experiment 2) relative to prevention cues. Experiments 3 and 4 provided evidence for the process account of these findings. suggesting that promotion cues, relative to prevention cues, produce a riskier response bias (Experiment 3) and bolster memory search for novel responses (Experiment 4). A final experiment provided evidence that individual differences in regulatory focus influence creative problem solving in a manner analogous to that of incidental promotion and prevention cues.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI